Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TERRY MCAULIFFE - DNC CHAIRMAN - WAS KEY DEFENDENT IN LORAL SHAREHOLDERS CASE ie. CHINAGATE - #17
Judicial Watch ^ | 7/23/99 | Larry Klayman

Posted on 10/24/2001 4:35:26 PM PDT by ChaseR

As of this past July 9th, 2001, Meng vs Schwartz - 98cv2859 Judge Lamberth denied a motion to alter judgement, denied a motion to amend judgement and denied a motion for relief of judgement in the Loral Shareholders case. - As of today, July 19, 2001, I'm starting this Loral Shareholders 'Discussion' Thread to make sure this Loral case stays in the spotlight (Latest Posts) for discussion purposes and for all future FR.com posters and lurkers to easily find.
I'm highlighting one of the key defendents, Terrance McAuliffe - because he is now Chairman of the DNC. Yesterday, on MSNBC Hardball, one of their guests was McAuliffe and just before he went off the air -he quickly made sure every viewer heard - that it was the Republicans who did not allow Campaign Finance Reform to make it to the Floor for a vote. But, who was the man who was a key defendent in this Loral Shareholders aiding and abetting espionage case?? TERRANCE McAULIFFE! And which party readily accepted 1.4 million in cash from Bernard Schwartz, the head of Loral? The DEMOCRAT PARTY! And which President allowed Johnny Chung, John Huang and Charlie Trie into the White House with hundreds of thousands of dollars from the Communist Chinese Army?? President Willaim Jefferson Clinton!

So, let's not delay. Let's not let McAuliffe and the DNC get away with fooling the public about - who took/takes the cash!

(With the statute of limitations about to run out, I appeal to everyone to post and/or bump these informative threads as often as you can.)


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: chinagate; clintonscandals; corruption; dnc; loral; mcauliffe; terrymcauliffe
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-153 next last
To: Snow Bunny
see you all later - keep the important threads bumped - have to leave town till Tuesday/have a good weekend/bye e.
41 posted on 10/27/2001 6:39:04 PM PDT by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: goldilucky
bttt, yep/I'm gone- later
42 posted on 10/27/2001 6:39:32 PM PDT by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: ChaseR
Did you call the radio program today and get a status report on the Loral case?
43 posted on 10/27/2001 6:48:08 PM PDT by bayourod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ChaseR
bump

Have a safe trip ChaseR.

44 posted on 10/27/2001 8:28:06 PM PDT by Snow Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: ChaseR
Double-rebounding bumpity.
45 posted on 10/28/2001 9:10:35 PM PST by FReethesheeples
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: bayourod
I didn't. Wife and kids had me running sideways this past Sat morning and I remembered at 1 pm or so - just missed it. I'll write it on the calendar for this coming Sat. morning. Sorry.
46 posted on 10/30/2001 5:46:58 AM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Snow Bunny
Thanks. Just got back last night.
Bad news. I see that this thread is faltering. Such a shame that McAuliffe is about to skate - as the statute of limitations runs out within two months. :( :( :(

bttt

47 posted on 10/30/2001 5:49:03 AM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: FReethesheeples; KLT; goldilucky; Ragtime Cowgirl; Snow Bunny
Even though other tremendously important events are now occuring - let's continue to keep this McAuliffe thread in the Latest - for future readers to fully examine.
(looks like McAuliffe and the Democrats are about to be HOMEFREE on Chinagate. :( :( :(
48 posted on 10/30/2001 5:53:04 AM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: ChaseR
They might seem to be free but criminal charges can be filed against those who have obstructed the case.
49 posted on 10/30/2001 10:05:48 PM PST by goldilucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: ChaseR
looks like McAuliffe and the Democrats are about to be HOMEFREE on Chinagate

Someone's waiting for them with a pitchfork (and not a room at the Ritz). Sorry I didn't ping you yesterday..took a baseball holiday. Speaking of pitchforks and holidays, hope your kids bring home the candy you like best tonight. (^:

50 posted on 10/31/2001 2:36:05 PM PST by Ragtime Cowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: goldilucky
"...but criminal charges can be filed against those who have obstructed the case.'

Glad to hear that! bttt

51 posted on 11/05/2001 7:51:40 PM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: ChaseR
Yes, it can be done!
52 posted on 11/05/2001 8:00:16 PM PST by goldilucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: goldilucky
bttt
53 posted on 11/10/2001 7:11:51 PM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Snow Bunny
to ya
54 posted on 11/10/2001 7:12:25 PM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: ChaseR
Another "praying-for-justice" bump.
Amazing (NOT) how the media never touches this.
55 posted on 11/10/2001 7:20:00 PM PST by TheGrimReaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: TheGrimReaper
"Amazing (NOT) how the media never touches this."

But we will - for months and years to come! Without fail!

56 posted on 11/10/2001 7:22:48 PM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: ChaseR
Yes, we will. On that you can rely with confidence.
57 posted on 11/10/2001 7:28:07 PM PST by TheGrimReaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: ChaseR
an evening bump!
58 posted on 11/10/2001 7:52:06 PM PST by goldilucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

Comment #59 Removed by Moderator

To: Black Jade
Thanks for the heads up!
60 posted on 11/11/2001 5:25:03 PM PST by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-153 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson