Posted on 10/21/2001 7:55:55 AM PDT by SharpEye
http://arc2.m2ktalk.com/alexam/101001.ram
Does anyone know if any of the people who've been arrested are part of the Hamas terrorist network here in the United States? Granted, as far as Democrats are concerned they're fighting "Israeli occupation," but I can't imagine why Republicans would look the other way when one of the most notorious terrorist outfits in the world is in our own backyard.
I hope it is explainable, but when someone of Schippers stature makes such charges, they should be officially addressed, don't you think?
And in general, I still want to see a Clinton house cleaning before I vote for Bush again, regardless of this current war.
He's the man all right. The man who wants to keep evidence of Clinton's crimes from the light of day. He and Bush. Let's just "move along".
Some of these people are scared to do anything because they've got skeletons in their own closets they don't want discovered.
I'm sick of corrupt politicians who get away with murder.
Their are good ones and bad ones...and it "looks" (though looks can be deceiving) like the bad ones are winning.
Thank God for courageous patriots who shine the light of truth on these roaches...exposing them.
With so many holdovers in control of so much of the upper levels of these agencies, there is no way to do an immediate purge without severely disrupting our ability to analyze and prevent immediate threats. This is gonna take awhile. Further complicating is the political ramifications. Outing the depth of Clinton's coverups would split and weaken the country initially, when we are already vulnerable. It would give the Dem's a chance to jump ship and cry how the GOP was using the crisis to purge and takeover gov't. Finally, outing this right now would expose many of those in prominent positions in the intelligence agencies to possible charges of treason(though for most I think that is too strong a charge to prove. Lets put it this way: Clinton and many holdovers are guilty of treason the way a guy who leaves a loaded gun laying around on the floor with a dozen little children around. Can he be convicted of murder, or just manslaughter, negligence, etc.?) and thus desperate to fight such outing tooth and nail. So a threat of outing might not only engulf the agencies in distracting infighting, but perhaps even in some self-destructive actions. These guys aren't dumb, I'm sure they have some blackmail plans and mechanisms to protect themselves.
Don't get me wrong, I would like nothing more than to have a purge and put the adults FULLY in charge, but the PROCESS is crucial, and Bush/Ashcroft may believe that a sudden disruption right now would be too risky. The same reason doctors often decide a tumor is inoperable, and choose non-invasive techniques to deal with certain cancers. My question now is: has anyone cornered Bob Barr(someone I think we all have a great deal of trust in) to get some indication of his stance on this, whether he views these as credible leads or not, and most importantly WHY he made his assessment?
Only if the shoe fits...
I can imagine liberals asking this same question of Clinton and Reno.
That is a great idea. Didn't some Freepers have contact with Barr back in the Clinton era? Schippers could be on to something, but there's something about him that seems just a bit opportunistic; my gut says he's onto something but many have questioned his motives/information. I would tend to think that there is something being held back from the American people on this, and it is really hard to imagine a justification.
As you say, someone should ask Barr to look into this, he would be an ideal trustworthy third party.
"Only if the shoe fits..."
Ya know that's total bs!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.