Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Strike By Army Rangers Masked Raid By Elite Unit
Yahoo News ^ | October 20, 2001 | Eric Schmitt

Posted on 10/20/2001 3:51:29 PM PDT by jokemoke

Saturday October 20 02:56 PM EDT

Strike by Army Rangers Masked Raid by Elite Unit, Official Says

By ERIC SCHMITT and THOM SHANKER The New York Times The raid into southern Afghanistan overnight Friday attacked Taliban military targets and masked a smaller mission to uncover Taliban and Al Qaeda leaders. The overt goal of the airborne assault, executed in a hit-and-run strike over several hours by more than 100 Army Rangers and other Special Forces, was to destroy underground bunkers, arms storage sites and air defense locations in the Taliban stronghold of Kandahar, a Defense Department official said today. Operations were carried out at more than one location there, the official said.

But the covert action aimed at the Taliban leadership was shrouded from view. It may still be under way or could resume soon, spurred by intelligence gathered from the overnight raid or in anticipation of movement or other responses by the Taliban and Al Qaeda in the aftermath of the attacks, the official said.

Army Rangers have in the past operated in tandem with the Army's secret counterterrorist unit, Delta Force. For example, the Rangers, the service's elite infantry, can create a flashy diversion so small Delta teams can carry out their mission. Or they can execute a more forceful entry than the Delta commandos could do themselves given their small numbers.

As the war on terrorism entered a new and dangerous ground phase, Pentagon officials this morning would not say whether the overnight mission had met its goals, and released only sketchy details.

President Bush, speaking from an economic summit gathering in Shanghai, hinted at the true aim of the mission. "We are destroying terrorist hideaways," he said. "We are slowly but surely encircling the terrorists so that we can bring them to justice."

Mr. Bush said that he mourned the loss of two servicemen killed in a helicopter accident related to the mission.

"There will be moments of sacrifice," the president said late this morning, as he was about to begin a meeting with the Japanese prime minister, Junichiro Koizumi. "We've seen two such examples today."

The president held a secure video-teleconference this morning with Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld, who was at his ranch in Taos, N.M., and with Gen. Richard B. Myers, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and Gen. Peter Pace, the vice chairman of the joint chiefs, participating from Washington.

Congressional leaders who were briefed by administration officials on the operation expressed support for the mission. "The military campaign has proceeded just as it should," Senator Tom Daschle of South Dakota, the majority leader, said through a spokesman. "It's not an assault on Islam or the Afghan people, but on terrorists and those who harbor them."

Airstrikes resumed over Afghanistan today, as B-1 and B-52 bombers and carrier-based FA-18's and F-14's dropped laser-guided and satellite-guided bombs during daytime raids over Kabul, the Afghan capital, Kandahar and Herat. "It's the same level as it's been the past few days robust," said Rear Adm. Craig R. Quigley, a Pentagon spokesman.

The Pentagon said that the two American servicemen killed in a supporting rescue mission had not crossed into Afghanistan. Defense officials said today that at least one other person aboard the helicopter was injured in the accident.

They declined to say whether there were any American casualties in the commando raid, although all helicopters involved in the raid reported safely back to the carrier Kitty Hawk in the Arabian Sea.

A senior Defense Department official denied Taliban reports that the helicopter had been shot down. Military and Pakistani officials said the aircraft crashed while landing at the Dalbandin air base in Pakistan, about 60 miles from the Afghan border.

The crash was caused by "a brown-out," the Defense Department official said, and cited initial reports describing a huge cloud of dust kicked up by the wash of the rotor blades upon landing, which apparently disoriented the pilot or interfered with the equipment.

One officer said the helicopter that crashed was an Army Blackhawk, the main heavily armed troop carrier for all Army forces. The Special Forces use a specially equipped version that provides better capabilities at night and can be refueled in the air.

The accident brings to three the number of American troops killed since the United States-led military campaign began two weeks ago with airstrikes aimed at Osama bin Laden, the prime suspect in the Sept. 11 attacks on the United States, and the government that is protecting him. A master sergeant was killed last week in a forklift accident while constructing an air strip in the Gulf state of Qatar.

Pakistan agreed today to allow American forces to use a fourth base, Shamsi, located near the convergence of the borders of Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iran. The base was built for wealthy Saudi sheiks who indulged in world-class falconry there.

The United States is already using bases in Pasni, Jacobabad and Dalbandin for search-and-rescue missions and as staging areas for Special Forces. "Now our commanders need to prepare and decide whether to take action in Kabul," Mr. Rabbani said. North of Kabul, the resistance faces dug-in Taliban troops whose front lines so far have been largely spared from American bombing.

At a briefing here today, Lakhdar Brahimi, the United Nations special representative for Afghanistan, discussed the future of Afghanistian in the event the Taliban were deposed. He spoke out against the idea of sending a United Nations peacekeeping force or any other armed foreign force to govern Afghanistan once the current military campaign ends.

"The Afghans wouldn't look fondly on foreigners with guns ruling them," Mr. Brahimi said.

Instead, he said, he reiterated in discussions with American officials here on Friday that the best solution would be for the United Nations to assist in negotiations with the warring parties to put together a council of national unity to govern the country.

He said that while the United Nations was committed to the rehabilitation, reconstruction and development of Afghanistan, it was "too early to say what formula would be suitable" for an international presence after the war ended.

Secretary General Kofi Annan has said he believes that he has weeks, not years, to help pull together a unified Afghan authority that could become a transitional government, bolstered by a huge committment of aid and expertise from the United Nations and member countries.

"Something is going to happen very suddenly and we won't have time to negotiate," said Fred Eckhard, the United Nations spokesman. "Unlike Cambodia, we don't have years to negotiate a settlement among the warring parties, we could only have weeks."

Mr. Brahimi said no group should be excluded from an Afghan transitional authority, especially since the current armed factions did not represent the vast majority of Afghan people.

"The 25 million Afghans have been hostage to these factions that don't represent more than 50,000, 60,000 maybe 70,000 people," he said.

Mr. Brahimi's top priority for the moment is getting food aid into the country in the next several weeks, before winter sets in and Muslim holy days of Ramadan begin.

"I think there are millions at risk not because of the bombing campaign but because of the drought and civil war," he said.

He also told the American officials in private meetings that the immediate problem for the humanitarianrelief effort is money. The United Nations has received only 10 percent of the $600 million pledged by countries for food relief to Afghanistan. In some instances, the U.N. has been unable to write the necessary checks for food and logistics expenses.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-205 last
To: GVgirl
BTW, this was a tactic realized for 400 years that apparently was not understood in Kosovo - as a result, while we pounded infrastructure pretty well, we were apparently almost totally ineffectual against the Serbian military.
201 posted on 10/21/2001 11:30:11 AM PDT by lepton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: fnord
My "attacks" are not directed at Americans, just the Marine Corps...I hope you get to enjoy retirement ... as for blood dancing on the graves ... how? The Marines need start seriously addressing their shortcomings, otherwise more AMERICANS will die. The Army has done MANY things poorly BUT the difference is that the Army is at least willing to admit to it's faults and shortcoming and take corrective action, the Marines will do anything do protect the image of the Corps. When you enlisted in 1975 did you know that the Marines at Koh Tang Island LEFT 3 Marines BEHIND to die a horrible death. Then how about the Corps making it secret for 20+ years "to protect the image of the Corps" . It looks to me that the Marines "Semper Fi" is only one way. When is truth and honor going to come to the "Corps"?
202 posted on 10/21/2001 12:01:56 PM PDT by Yasotay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: lepton
Thanks! Very informative.

Artillery attacks are devastating and very cost effective against concentrated troops. Ground attacks are devastating against scattered troops.

I can hardly wait!

203 posted on 10/21/2001 1:31:50 PM PDT by GVnana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: sneakypete
The SEALs were greatly feared as skilled body snatchers by the enemy in Vietnam, and most of this was unrelated to water....
204 posted on 10/22/2001 8:07:51 AM PDT by tracer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: Yasotay
Your naivette, lack of a grasp on history, your belligerence, and your phony bravado makes one wonder if you ever were in the military at all, let alone a company commander in an elite unit. You sound like every drunken windbag wannabee I've ever had the misfortune of "witnessing."

You also forget to mention the tragic spectacle of Rangers being dragged through the streets in Somalia due to no FUs of their own but that of the candy-assed politicians and Army "brass" over them.

Every branch of the military has had their share of defeat as well as long traditions selfless bravery and valor and have suffered slaughters due to the ineptitude of those who command or support them.

To spit on the memory of SEALS, Marines, and others who have given their all while carrying out their orders is reprehensible, irresponsible, un-American, and unpatriotic. To paraphrase, I have known warriors, served with warriors, and many warriors are friencds of mine. And you, sir, do not speak the words of a warrior.

You certainly have picked the wrong forum and time in our Nation's history to show your true colors and cause one to wonder why you left your Halls of Personal Glory after only ten years.

And don't ask me what I did to a serve my country. I'm not given to bragging about it and, frankly, you don't deserve to know........

205 posted on 10/22/2001 8:38:45 AM PDT by tracer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-205 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson