Be, you're the one that put so much faith in Judical Watch's claims regarding the claims Hill made in her affidavit. I simply pulled up the affidavit and showed that not only did it NOT say what you (or JW) said it said, it really says the opposite of what you (or JW) have claimed. Again I emphasize how important the primary source documents are in cutting through the smoke of special interests.
And again I'll point out to you, since you don't seem to be aware of it or are not reading what I wrote, that the affidavit PRECEEDED her secret testimony before Judge Lamberth. It is in her secret testimony where Klayman says she revealed the details regarding Ron Brown's visit to Clinton. And again, I'll point out to you that you haven't provided ONE INSTANCE where Klayman lied or even shaded the truth in a press release related to Chinagate, Filegate or the Brown death. And, no even her affidavit does NOT say the opposite of what I believe Klayman reported Nolanda said in her testimony.
Why are you so committed to discrediting Klayman and Chung while apparently holding Brown in high esteem (remember ... you claimed he was "on top of the world"). I'm not arguing that Chung was a criminal. He was. But at least he did what few of the other criminals in Clinton's mafia did. He came clean. Yet you seem to despise him for that. Either that or you hate Klayman so much that you'll use Chung's criminality as an excuse for slamming Klayman. You can't back up your accusation that what Klayman did vis a vis his mom was an example of poor character. As another poster pointed out, it was actually done to protect her. Now unless you have some source material to dispute that then I think you actually owe Klayman an apology.
Finally, let me ask you, YES OR NO, do you think that Clinton had motive to wish Brown dead? YES or NO, do you deny any of the other items listed in my list of suspicious items related to Brown's death? YES or NO, should Ron Brown's body be exhumed and autopsied by people we can trust?