Posted on 10/19/2001 4:52:04 PM PDT by ALOHA RONNIE
...FRI = HILLARY fails to put JOHNNY CHUNG in Jail
...SAT = HILLARY called our Enemy by NYC Fire/Police
...SUN = Not too bad, I'd say...
Are campaign finance practices to work for all politicians while turning a blind eye to DemonRats and Hitlery? That is how it appears to work, my advogado/avocado/aguacate/guacamole friend. (So, is advogado an Italian word for attorney? Spanish is abogado. Or is advogado Spanish or Italian for "advocate?" Who/what are you advocating, my friend?)
Back to the point at hand, Johnny has taken his punishment like a man. He has done everything by the book that the judge has told him to do. He has gone above service to country by trying to ferret out Chicoms, put his life in danger, worked with the Long Beach Patriots, etc. Peter Paul hasn't done those things, yet. Who knows, he may never do them. But to try and liken Johnny to John Dean and then switch his likeness to that of Peter Paul, "a jilted lover," so you say, defies logic or the gravity (a little levity) of the situation.
And again I'll point out to you, since you don't seem to be aware of it or are not reading what I wrote, that the affidavit PRECEEDED her secret testimony before Judge Lamberth. It is in her secret testimony where Klayman says she revealed the details regarding Ron Brown's visit to Clinton. And again, I'll point out to you that you haven't provided ONE INSTANCE where Klayman lied or even shaded the truth in a press release related to Chinagate, Filegate or the Brown death. And, no even her affidavit does NOT say the opposite of what I believe Klayman reported Nolanda said in her testimony.
Why are you so committed to discrediting Klayman and Chung while apparently holding Brown in high esteem (remember ... you claimed he was "on top of the world"). I'm not arguing that Chung was a criminal. He was. But at least he did what few of the other criminals in Clinton's mafia did. He came clean. Yet you seem to despise him for that. Either that or you hate Klayman so much that you'll use Chung's criminality as an excuse for slamming Klayman. You can't back up your accusation that what Klayman did vis a vis his mom was an example of poor character. As another poster pointed out, it was actually done to protect her. Now unless you have some source material to dispute that then I think you actually owe Klayman an apology.
Finally, let me ask you, YES OR NO, do you think that Clinton had motive to wish Brown dead? YES or NO, do you deny any of the other items listed in my list of suspicious items related to Brown's death? YES or NO, should Ron Brown's body be exhumed and autopsied by people we can trust?
1 - I think Johnny Chung is a dishonorable person and only 'came clean' because he was busted BIG TIME with his hand in Hillary's pocket. Instead of taking he was stuffing it full of cash to help defeat the things I hold important.
2 - I think all of you that defend Chung and hold him up to be a hero have selective morality which I argue is worse than having no morals at all. Once a thief always a thief.
3 - I don't trust a thing that LK or JW says without independent confirmation.
4 - I do think that Ron Brown may have been murdered and his murder may have been at the hands of the Clinton administration. However I DON'T believe that Brown ever said he was going to rat Clinton out. He was a very loyal democrat and was on top of the world (yes I will use that phrase again) at the time of his death. I, unlike you, have shown first source documents that indicate Brown was working harder than ever to protect Clinton, not rat him out.
5 - I dont really care either way if they dig up Brown's body. I've seen the autopsy pictures and it looks like he was shot. Thats good enough for me.
Now do you all see where *I* am coming from? I agree with you on just about everything except: JW is a very poor source of information and Johnny Chung is a stain on the flag and honor of this country and them men that have and are fighting to defend it.
This business about "once a thief, always a thief" doesn't hold water. Many men have been converted, including Chuck Colson, and afterwards done remarkable things for good. A good example would be John Newton. John Newton was a slave runner - one of the worst. Robert Wilberforce, an anti-slavery minister converted Newton. Newton turned from a drunken, swearing, slave-runner to a fighter against slavery. The memorial to Newton's conversion was the hymn he wrote, "Amazing Grace." {"I once was lost, but now am found, 'twas blind but now can see..."}
Don't bother hitting on Johnny Chung anymore until you can prove that he didn't have a change of heart. As far as I'm concerned, you are a liberal posing as a moderate and your arguments hold as much water as a collander.
...and GOD is LOVE.
And another witness/Riady's March 19, 2001 China-Gate Plea Agreement Hearing
Heard you on Ray Briem this evening. Don't cha' just love they way they knocked ol' bags Hitlery in Madison Square? I think it's just great. And here all this time, the media's been feeding us with the bull about 60% of New Yorkers supporting Hillary. What a joke. And I haven't seen this even on the news!
...HILLARY CLINTON's being BOO'ed... was NOT reported in the same PAUL LIEBERMAN Los Angeles Times Article
...2001 = George Orwell's 1984 for sure....!
...American Hero JOHNNY CHUNG is NOT standing alone.
Yeah, more like CommieSpeak putting on its very best. Gee ....L.A. Times....just humor us once again won't cha'! No, the L.A. Times is losing money...nobody's buying the bull anymore!
Man did I hear such BOOING from the New Yorkers on Hillary. Right on New York! Kick that @!$%^ out of there!
You betcha! Johnny Chung isn't standing alone.
For MP, I will respond by saying no. Clinton thought he was untouchable. They were good friends. Didn't you see Clinton cry at Ron Brown's funeral? :)
True, but their good deeds were selfless. In other words, you can't call Johnny Chung a saved man because of the deeds he's done that you consider 'good' are the very ones that kept his butt out of a long prison term. You're enabling and covering for a criminal and a very dishonest man MP. Chung has a worse criminal record than Bill Clinton and here you are defending him and calling *ME* a liberal.
I say throw the bum in jail and throw away the key. If it wasn't for this convicted felon, people like John McSHAME wouldn't be given the ammunition to try and take away my first amendment rights. You're on the wrong side of morality here defending this Clinton supporting rat.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.