Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Israel Finds Radiological Backpack Bomb
United Press International via COMTEX ^ | 14 Oct, 2001 | RICHARD SALE, UPI Terrorism Correspondent

Posted on 10/19/2001 9:27:45 AM PDT by spycatcher

WASHINGTON, Oct 14, 2001 (United Press International via COMTEX) -- Israeli security last month arrested a man linked to suspected terrorist mastermind Osama bin Laden armed with a radiological backpack bomb, as he attempted to enter Israel from the Palestinian Territories via a border checkpoint at Ramallah, according to U.S. government officials.

The arrest took place during the last week of September, according to one knowledgeable official who spoke on condition of anonymity. He declined to give the exact date of arrest. Two other sources interviewed by UPI confirmed the incident, but also declined to give further details.

"People know how to walk a dog back," one said, meaning that relating too exact an account could lead to the identification of the source of the information.

Regarding the arrest, a U.S. government official said: "There was only one individual involved. He was from Pakistan."

Another source said U.S. officials believed that the suspect had probably gotten to the territories via Lebanon.

Information on the arrest went immediately to U.S. President Bush and a close circle of advisors, another U.S. official said. He described the appearance and character of the top-secret report circulated among the Cabinet members and signed by each official present.

Former Pentagon terrorism expert, Peter Probst, described a radiological bomb as a device with a small explosive core that is encased in radioactive material. "It would not kill a great many people, but it would contaminate a considerable area with radiation," he said.

A U.S. government expert said that the weapon captured by Israel was a backpack device that CIA officials learned about through Russian intelligence agents in place in 1995.

He emphasized it was not a so-called nuclear suitcase bomb.

The CIA had intelligence reports from senior Arab intelligence officials alleging that in October 1998 bin Laden had obtained one or two nuclear suitcase weapons from a Central Asian republic in return for $30 million in cash and two tons of heroin worth $70 million - a deal brokered by the Chechen mafia.

Russian Gen. Aleksandr Ivanovich Lebed, a former national security advisor to then-President Yeltsin acknowledged publicly in 1997 that several nuclear suitcase bombs had disappeared from Russia's arsenal.

But former CIA counter-terrorism official Vince Cannistraro has no patience with such accounts: "All talk of bin Laden having a nuclear suitcase bomb is crap," he said.

Cannistraro could not be reached for comment about the backpack device.

Nuclear suitcase bombs were designed for Soviet Speznatz or special operations troops to assault and destroy NATO command and control bunkers in Europe in the event of a NATO-Soviet war. The devices could not be detonated without matching codes held in strictest security by Moscow, a former CIA official said.

Backpack bombs have no such codes, but they were also designed for Spetznetz forces and have such an intricate and complex system of activation that the ability of a terrorist to detonate one "would be incredibly limited," according to one U.S. government official.

"There is such a complicated sequence you have to perform that some terrorist isn't going to be able to get it to work. You have to be very highly trained," an intelligence official agreed, describing the chances that the device could have been activated as "practically miniscule."

Probst is nevertheless convinced that radiological bombs are still a danger for New York City. "Bin Laden is fascinated by Wall Street. My fear is that he will attempt to smuggle in some "dirty" bomb that wouldn't kill many people but would dangerously contaminate the area," he said.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Israel; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: backpackbomb; dirtynukes; israel; nukes; palesintians; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
Not a duplicate post. Another post was unreliable source. This one from UPI.
1 posted on 10/19/2001 9:27:45 AM PDT by spycatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: spycatcher
An Arab setting of an NBC weapon in Israel will ignite a fury from the IDF that the world has never seen. They would make a clean sweep and destroy tens of thousands of people that would want Israel destroyed. An NBC attack is the most counter-productive move a terrorist organization could ever make.
2 posted on 10/19/2001 9:44:46 AM PDT by DCBryan1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spycatcher
But former CIA counter-terrorism official Vince Cannistraro has no patience with such accounts: "All talk of bin Laden having a nuclear suitcase bomb is crap," he said.

If they ever had one, they would have used it already.

3 posted on 10/19/2001 9:46:12 AM PDT by Reelect President Dubya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1
It would lead to the Samson Option
4 posted on 10/19/2001 9:51:33 AM PDT by spycatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: spycatcher
"There is such a complicated sequence you have to perform that some terrorist isn't going to be able to get it to work. You have to be very highly trained," an intelligence official agreed, describing the chances that the device could have been activated as "practically miniscule."

Absolutely. It would be as impossible as highjacking multiple airliners armed with nothing but small blades, and crashing them into large buildings...

Actually, this may be the case, that they couldn't detonate or use one of these things, however, just because they haven't used them doesn't mean they dont have that up their sleeve. IF they do, they might be waiting for some kind of massive attack by the US, something nuclear, before they set one off in retaliation for that. You see, the attacks on the WTC and Pentagon might have been intended to elicit just such a response from an enraged President... perhaps they miscalculated his measured response.

W kicks arse!

5 posted on 10/19/2001 10:01:33 AM PDT by Paradox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paradox
A crude dirty bomb with explosives and radioactive waste would be easy to make. It looks like this one was a specialized miniature design -- made by the Russians when they made the real suitcase nukes.
6 posted on 10/19/2001 10:40:11 AM PDT by spycatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: spycatcher
Nothing good comes from Ramallah.
7 posted on 10/19/2001 10:54:17 AM PDT by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spycatcher
The article discusses an an "intricate and complex system of activation" necessary to make the bomb go off. That is meaningless.

For a nuclear bomb everything has to occur in a precise order down to the thousandth of a second. In a radiological bomb, all you need is radioactive material and high explosives. The intent of such a bomb is simply to disperse the radioactive material over a large area, contaminating it. A couple of pounds of uranium, too little or too un-enriched for a nuclear bomb, could terrorize a large area.

8 posted on 10/19/2001 11:07:23 AM PDT by Looking for Diogenes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Looking for Diogenes
Sounds like a purposely complicated security mechanism to prevent mishaps or use by enemy if stolen. You would want the same arming complexity for dirty nukes as real nukes. No way these would be designed to go off by just pulling a pin.
9 posted on 10/19/2001 11:44:58 AM PDT by spycatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: spycatcher
True. But if terrorists got one and couldn't figure out how to detonate the device they could simply attach additional explosives and a new detonator. All that is required is the dispersion of the radioactive agent. They could even dismantle the thing and repackage it, or grind up the metal and spray it from out of a plane.

Likewise, if they got hold of a nuclear bomb, but couldn't figure out the mechanisms, they could repackage the radioactive material, spreading the uranium or plutonium rather than igniting it.

Plutonium is just about the deadliest poison on earth. A pound or two would make a real mess, if distributed widely.

10 posted on 10/19/2001 12:02:13 PM PDT by Looking for Diogenes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Looking for Diogenes
Sounds like a high price to pay for nuclear waste.
11 posted on 10/19/2001 12:41:23 PM PDT by flamefront
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: flamefront
Oops - sorry mixed up the 1998 vs 2001.
12 posted on 10/19/2001 12:43:28 PM PDT by flamefront
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: Headlong
Should be as reliable as the Washington Times or WorldnetDaily
14 posted on 10/19/2001 12:59:24 PM PDT by spycatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: spycatcher; CommiesOut
What, Iraq is not involved? Must be wrong then.
15 posted on 10/19/2001 1:09:35 PM PDT by madrussian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madrussian
If Vince Cannistraro said it's crap it must be crap.
16 posted on 10/19/2001 1:27:31 PM PDT by CommiesOut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: Headlong
I think WND is a front for Roy Masters followers. They live in an IRS-proof compound in Oregon. ;)

At least the Moonies stay out of the day to day editorial decisions!

18 posted on 10/19/2001 1:44:18 PM PDT by spycatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: CommiesOut
"A U.S. government expert said that the weapon captured by Israel was a backpack device that CIA officials learned about through Russian intelligence agents in place in 1995. He emphasized it was not a so-called nuclear suitcase bomb. "

Vince was commenting on rumors that bin Laden had suitcase nukes, not on this dirty radiological device.

19 posted on 10/19/2001 1:47:54 PM PDT by spycatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: spycatcher
If what these western neocommies write here is true then this country is in big trouble.
20 posted on 10/19/2001 2:21:49 PM PDT by CommiesOut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson