Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Republican_Strategist
Bin Laden Terror Widow Blames Clinton

Clinton Salmonella Scare a Hoax?

Olson Book: Ex-Nun Alone Held Clinton Accountable
38 posted on 11/05/2001 8:34:11 AM PST by Republican_Strategist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Republican_Strategist
***Paul Harvey:Bill Clinton Spent More Time And Money Going After Bill Gates Than bin Laden***

Did Clinton Help the Taliban Increase Heroin Production?
39 posted on 11/05/2001 8:38:31 AM PST by Republican_Strategist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: Republican_Strategist; Alamo-Girl
Re: the story on News Max: Bin Laden Terror Widow Blames Clinton contains this information:

"My husband, a communications expert, worked for Clinton," she told Malzberg. "He was a very hard worker and dealt with White House communications and saved the government a lot of money. I know if my husband made a mistake that could have jeopardized President Clinton's security ... my husband would have been held accountable. I just expect the same of him [Clinton]."

This is very telling and adds to the "Clinton trail of death."

Not that this man who worked in the White House Communications was a terrorist victim BECAUSE he had worked for the Clinton White House in communications.

And not that Barbara Olson was a terrorist victim BECAUSE she was THE MOST PROLIFIC and EFFECTIVE anti-Hillary Clinton writer/speaker of our day.....

But isn't it something that both of these people with ties to Bill Clinton WERE terrorist victims?

Wonder what the odds are of such connections being true?

It's enough to make me locate my best and brightest tinfoil.....then again....as an original VRWC / TFH brigade member - that hat is not too far away at any given moment.

Actually - if you want to know the truth of what I think - it is that Clinton did not go after the terrorists for 3 main reasons:

1. He/she had/has friends/contacts among them and he/she used/are using those friends to control THEM (as he controlled his domestic terrorist/organized crime friends) rather than to try to STOP them.

2. He/she is a terrorist themself(themselves) and find the actions of other terrorists - educational, useful, but not "evil." Of course this is true. They are Marxists through and through and believe in the use of FORCE - violent if necessary - to ACHIEVE THEIR GOALS! The fact that a REAL MARXIST TERRORIST sits in the US Senate is simply beyond belief....though not really given the complicit and EVIL US media and Demarxocratic party.

3. The Clinton crime machine was/is determined to only use PC reasons to engage an "enemy" (ethnic cleansing was the politically acceptable reason for our involvement in the Balkan conflicts, nothing else). In other words - murder of innocent civilians IS NOT A REASON TO FIGHT TO STOP THAT MURDER OR TO BUILD OUR MILITARY TO PREVENT FURTHER SUCH MURDERS to the Clintons. The Clinton mafia wanted to get through their terms without a "war" and they did. (The Balkan situation was another case of USING THE TERRORISTS for their goals). It did not further the "legacy" to go after Bin Laden or any of the other terrorists that they coddled. Nor would it have furthered their power. Releasing convicted terrorists DID further their power, however.

48 posted on 11/05/2001 8:57:26 AM PST by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson