Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lake
"good" is not defined only as being friendly with America. That wasn't the only criteria.

This though would be an interesting topic to look up...when and were and how the US got relations with the KMT...

One thing for sure, the KMT were not radical ideological Maoist communists. That probably tipped the scales in their favor...

Also we have to realize, in the 1920s and 30s and all the way up into the 1940s, the Communists were a small band of radicals out in the countryside. They did not even have the appearance of a legit government. What should America do? Choose a bunch of hooligans running around the countryside, or a somewhat established government?

146 posted on 10/25/2001 1:03:49 PM PDT by super175
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]


To: super175
>>One thing for sure, the KMT were not radical ideological Maoist communists. That probably tipped the scales in their favor...

Radical or not, it doesn't matter. The KMT was much more radical than the warlords it defeated. So what? I bet the US would have recognized PRC in 1949 if Mao promised to protect the US's interets. The Ameican ambassador didn't leave Nanjing when PLA seized the city. Instead he satyed there for several months and tried many times to contact CCP authorities with the help of his student, Huang Hua, who later became Chinese foreign minister. But Mao asked the US to apologize for its "mistake" or "crime" of supporting Chiang in the civil war before considering the possibility of establishing any diplomatic relations with the US. Of course this was something the US wouldn't do, so CCP expelled all US citizens from China.

>>They did not even have the appearance of a legit government.

Actually the CCP did set up a central government, called "The Soviet Republic of China", in its territory. Of course no one recognized it.

>>What should America do? Choose a bunch of hooligans running around the countryside, or a somewhat established government?

An established government was the right choice. No question about it. However, the US got so much involved in the civil war between KMT and CCP that there were no way CCP could be friendly to the US after it took power. Otherwise there wouldn't have been the Korea War and the Vietman War. Britain was smart. It stayed neutral during the civil war. Although it was ready to abandon Hongkong when PLA was marching towards the colony, Mao's troops stopped advancing at the border. Britain and China established deplomatic relations in 1950 and the CCP didn't confiscate or freeze British assets in China.

149 posted on 10/25/2001 2:10:39 PM PDT by Lake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson