Skip to comments.
Taliban Reportedly Arming Civilians
CBS News ^
| 10/18/01
Posted on 10/18/2001 2:29:18 PM PDT by kattracks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
If they are arming civilians to fight, can they still be considered civilians?
1
posted on
10/18/2001 2:29:18 PM PDT
by
kattracks
To: kattracks
If they are arming civilians to fight, can they still be considered civilians? Nope ... pick up a weapon on a battlefield and you become a legitimate target.
To: kattracks
Hopefully, the civillians will come to their senses and use their weapons upon the taliwhackers.
To: kattracks
So now the jackasses cannot complaint to the Klinton News Nitwits that we have bombed civilians! Good.
To: Centurion2000
Well said....
5
posted on
10/18/2001 2:34:30 PM PDT
by
donozark
To: kattracks; butter pecan fan
There are no innocents in regards to the enemy! Nuke em till they glow and shoot em in the dark!
To: kattracks
If they are arming civilians to fight, can they still be considered civilians? Better question: if they are arming civilians to fight, will those civilians still be carrying their weapons after the Taliban are no longer threatening to kill their families?
I'm thinking here of the crack front-line troops fielded by Iraq during the gulf war. They basically just grabbed guys off the street and shipped them to the front. And we've all seen the picture of the guy who surrendered to the UAV.
7
posted on
10/18/2001 2:39:50 PM PDT
by
r9etb
To: kattracks
The leadership and our guests (bin Laden and his associates) are mobile and safe, and Americans can't find them," declared Abdul Hanan Himat, a Taliban spokesman. The very last thing we want to do is kill or capture bin laden. The instant he is taken our media would start screaming we are killing civilians in a Bush vendetta. They would try to turn the American people into a force to demand our withdrawl. If bin laden came in to surrender, we would kick his a$$ out not arrest him. We have to take out the terrorist infrastructure and if we get bin Laden now we will not likely get to do that.
Ten years from now the media would be screaming why didn't Dubya take them out when he had the chance. The fact is most Amercians can't remember 10 years. But they are aware of bin Laden. Until we have destroyed the terrorist network, bin Laden is a safe as Tom Daschle with the post office on strike.
To: kattracks
Arming civilians is always a good sign.
9
posted on
10/18/2001 2:44:14 PM PDT
by
jlogajan
To: r9etb
Better question: if they are arming civilians to fight, will those civilians still be carrying their weapons after the Taliban are no longer threatening to kill their families? Best question: What happens if you give somebody a gun and then make this sort of threat against them?
10
posted on
10/18/2001 2:46:16 PM PDT
by
steve-b
To: kattracks
If they are arming civilians, then they are incredibly desperate. Even the meatheads in the Taliban have to know that a civilian isn't likely to put up much effective resistance.
11
posted on
10/18/2001 2:48:39 PM PDT
by
Dog Gone
To: kattracks
150 men? Shi&&& we'll just send over some of our West Side Crips and throw in a few Latin Kings. They should cut them up real nice in about an hour. I think they will even supply their own guns!
12
posted on
10/18/2001 2:51:39 PM PDT
by
Lowell
To: Dog Gone
Even the meatheads in the Taliban have to know that a civilian isn't likely to put up much effective resistance. Or put up with the BS the Taliban does to the Afghani people. Just imagine what will happen when the next Talibnut decides to beat or kill one of these newly armed civilian's mother, sister, daughter or wife.
"I KNOW you didn't just whip my mother!!! BANG"
13
posted on
10/18/2001 2:54:49 PM PDT
by
freeeee
To: Common Tator
The very last thing we want to do is kill or capture Bin Laden. Here's a hideous scenario for you:
- US troops caputure OBL, or someone else does and turns him over to US troops.
- OBL shipped to US for trial, tried, convicted of some specific number (~6000) of first degree murders, sentenced to death.
- World (meaning Eurotrash) outraged at barbarism of death penalty.
They were outraged about Tim McVeigh, why not OBL?
14
posted on
10/18/2001 2:57:48 PM PDT
by
Salman
To: steve-b
Best question: What happens if you give somebody a gun and then make this sort of threat against them? Hush. Before you know it people in this country are going to be buying guns and then the government won't be able...uh...never mind...
To: kattracks
If they are arming civilians to fight, can they still be considered civilians?No, they become combatants.
To: jlogajan
Arming civilians is always a good signI'm thinking volksturm.
To: kattracks
Their desperate
To: He Rides A White Horse
Can you imagine 150 untrained Afgans, or 5000 untrained Afgans when an F-15 flies over at 800 knots, at about 50 AGL. No bonbs, just a sonic boom.......
HELLO!!!
To: MindBender26
Can you imagine 150 untrained Afgans, or 5000 untrained Afgans when an F-15 flies over at 800 knots, at about 50 AGL. No bonbs, just a sonic boom.......Should be a real mindbender.....;)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson