Lets follow your premise to its logical.
Sample case: by means of force, coersion, or otherwise, you are detained and forced to conduct hard labor. Your property is simply taken from you. You are brutally beaten if you speak, or pray, or on the whim of your guards. The party enslaving you has more than enough guards and money to keep you in this state perpetually unless an outside force intervenes.
The result of this situation is that you are unable to assert and hence enjoy any right to freedom: to be free from detention without accusation of a crime, to be secure in your person, house, paper, and effect, etc.
Therefore, by your definition of rights, even though this entire scenario occurs within the US, you have no rights.
ergo, your definition of rights is false.
Au contraire mon frere. There is no denying reality.
Substitute "clothes" for "rights" and you can see how silly your conclusion seems...
If you can't sense, touch, enjoy and embrace them, you don't have them.