Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A little bit of history.
Avalon Project: The Barbary Treaties ^ | June 10th 1797 | Various

Posted on 10/17/2001 8:57:47 PM PDT by In veno, veritas

Treaty of Tripoli
ARTICLE 11.
As the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion,-as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion or tranquility of Musselmen,-and as the said States never have entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mehomitan nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:
Very interesting read which I related to our current situation in Afganistan.
1 posted on 10/17/2001 8:57:47 PM PDT by In veno, veritas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: In veno, veritas
As the government of the United States of America is
not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion

This needs repeating.

2 posted on 10/17/2001 9:04:49 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: In veno, veritas
  In veno, veritas

 veno- or veni- or ven-
 pref.

      Vein: venipuncture.

              Eh?

 

3 posted on 10/17/2001 9:06:55 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: In veno, veritas
"A survey of the state constitutions, charters, national pronouncements, and official declarations of the thirteen state goverments would convince any representative from Tripoli that America was a Christian nation by law. The American consul in Algiers, Joel Barlow, had to construct a treaty that would assure the Dey of Tripoli that troops would never be used to impose Christianity on a Muslim people.

"What was Mr. Barlow trying to say? Representing a nation whose laws do not make heresy a crime, and which has no established church or official religion, was he not trying to reassure those of a different religious and cultural tradition that we, for our part, had worked out an arrangemnt between the prevailing religion in America and our governmetn that did not commit the destiny of that faitghinto the keeping of the state? Our government, therefore, could enter into amicable relationships with nations whose religion differs from our own."

America's Christian History Gary DeMar. Chapter 8: The Treaty of Tripoli.

4 posted on 10/17/2001 9:20:47 PM PDT by DeaconBenjamin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: In veno, veritas
Here is the truth about Tripoli!

Stephen Decatur

The Marines where just along for the ride!

5 posted on 10/17/2001 9:21:40 PM PDT by Nitro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: In veno, veritas
Not being a historian, can a helpful scholar out there please define the terms "Musselmen" and "Mehomitan"?

Thank you.

6 posted on 10/17/2001 9:41:45 PM PDT by MCH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MCH
They're old variants of the words Muslim(s) and Mohammedan.
7 posted on 10/17/2001 9:47:14 PM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: In veno, veritas
While the United States government is not based on Christianity, it's culture is to a very large extent based upon Judeo Christian principals. The government is just required to be neutral in matters of religous belief. That does not mean that principals based upon religous beliefs cannot work their way into the laws, quite the contrary. The wall of Separation of Church and State only works in one direction.

For an interesting thesis on how the long standing "Barbary" crises helped lead to adoption of the Constituion to replace the Articles of Confederation see:

THE BARBARY CORSAIRS: CONQUERORS OF UNITED STATES COMMERCE AND THE ARTICLES OF CONFEDERATION

Wasn't this treaty one of the early ones when we were still trying to placate the Barbary states which supported the pirates? It didn't work then, and it won't work now, with our latter day, "pirates, who are motivated more by zealatry than avarice. After they, and the other states, violated the earlier treaties, we kicked their collective asses, both of pirates and "governments", and the later treaties were, shall we say, more favorable to US interests.

8 posted on 10/17/2001 9:48:48 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
Misspelled (vino)
9 posted on 10/18/2001 5:18:55 PM PDT by In veno, veritas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin
Excellent find. Thanks.
10 posted on 10/18/2001 5:20:01 PM PDT by In veno, veritas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
Is this a constitutional classic? It should be. I think that the treaty was before the main war. It was written, according to my source, in late 1700's. While if you read about Decature, it said the war was in the early 1800's.

Amazing simillarities on the Arab style between then and now.

11 posted on 10/18/2001 5:34:22 PM PDT by In veno, veritas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
I agree. I would also state that our principles, if we are to be a just nation, will always be reflected in our government.
12 posted on 10/18/2001 5:36:27 PM PDT by In veno, veritas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson