Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Oldsailor
I have difficulty understanding this. What it this geologist talking about and why does he think he found Bin Laden based on what the rocks looked like in the video?
6 posted on 10/16/2001 7:30:11 AM PDT by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SamAdams76
You could apply the same principle here in the US. Rock formations in Northern Texas are far different from those in Southern Texas.

It's kind of like a geologic signature.

10 posted on 10/16/2001 7:37:08 AM PDT by Bikers4Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: SamAdams76
The article is fairly well written so I just assumed that anyone with an IQ above body temp. would have some understanding of this.
11 posted on 10/16/2001 7:44:24 AM PDT by Oldsailor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: SamAdams76
I have difficulty understanding this. What it this geologist talking about and why does he think he found Bin Laden based on what the rocks looked like in the video?

If the rock behind Bin Laden was sedimentary, it would suggest that the area was underwater at some recent point in its history. I suspect only southern Afghanistan is at a low enough elevation to have been under a sea in the recent past.

Any experts out there who can back that up or discredit my theory?

15 posted on 10/16/2001 7:54:21 AM PDT by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: SamAdams76
why does he think he found Bin Laden based on what the rocks

Not all rocks are alike. The rocks seen in the video are found only in certain regions. Like the White Cliffs of Dover. Nothing else like it.

35 posted on 10/16/2001 3:46:09 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson