Angelo is going beyond that. He is claiming that the Jewish canon is final--the end of Revelation--and that by sticking with this --and the commemtaries that are based on this assumption--he rules out Jesus as the Messiah. I remember even as a child about the long historical "gap" between the last books of the Old Testament. At bottom I am questioning the authority of the --supposed Great Synagogue--that put together the Jewish canon. Why should I accept it over that of the Council of Constantinople?
Angelo is going beyond that. He is claiming that the Jewish canon is final--the end of Revelation--and that by sticking with this --and the commemtaries that are based on this assumption--he rules out Jesus as the Messiah. He is a Jew! Of course he believes that Revelation ended before we do.
Angelo's point is that certain key verses appear to have bad translations into Greek and these bad ideas have permeated Christianity, making us see things in the OT that he claims are not there.
SD