Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hopefulpilgrim
Re 262 of the previous thread

I, Hopefulpilgrim, wrote: If one takes this statement ("This is My body") literally, one would have to take all other metaphors He employed literally also.

SoothingDave wrote: You have simply started with a fallacy. We use our judgment to determine what is literal and what is figurative. You are saying that we are not allowed to discern, we must accept everything as literal or everything as figurative. I suppose this includes the stories about the Resurrection as well.

First of all, you are right---the way in which I worded it DID make the statement fallacious. Let me try it again: If one takes this statement ("This is My body") literally, other OBVIOUS metaphors could also be taken literally, such as "I am the Vine; you are the branches." (Well, I'm not sure how much better that is, but I hope you understand my gist.)

Thank you for recognizing the fallacy, when pointed out. Now, on we go. This amended statement of yours hinges on the word "obvious." To you, Jesus at the Last Supper is obviously speaking metaphorically. Not so to me. That was kind of my entire point -- discerning which things to take literally and which figuratively and which both and neither is the task of making sense of Scripture. It's what we are discussing here.

Second, I thought y'all couldn't use common discernment when reading the scriptures.

Says who? We are certainly free to use any of the intellectual tools Our Lord gave us. What we should not do is use our own reading to develop heretical doctrine.

You also wrote: ...in order to puzzle out what he meant when he used metaphors like "I and the Father are one" and "He who has seen me has seen the Father"

Why do you call these metaphors? I see these as statements of fact.

That's my point. What I may see as metaphors, you see as strightforward fact. And vice versa. (In this case I am playing devil's advocate, but I have seen confused folks read those statments metaphorically.)

SD

5 posted on 10/15/2001 7:16:50 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SoothingDave
Hi ya' Dave! OK, back to the metaphors. I had written: If one takes this statement ("This is My body") literally, other OBVIOUS metaphors could also be taken literally, such as "I am the Vine; you are the branches."

You replied: This amended statement of yours hinges on the word "obvious." To you, Jesus at the Last Supper is obviously speaking metaphorically. Not so to me.

Oh, but it IS obviously a figure of speech! For one thing, interpreting His words ("This is My body") as being figurative is the logical way to interpret it. Besides, there is NO precedence anywhere in Scripture for equating an inanimate object, such as bread, with a living being.

284 posted on 10/16/2001 12:07:48 AM PDT by hopefulpilgrim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: SoothingDave
As to metaphors, that of the body and blood is different from the others in that He emphasized it elsewhere- saying that "my flesh is real food and my blood is real drink" which caused most of his disciples to have second thoughts. They abandoned Him, all but the twelve, because of those "hard sayings."
16,223 posted on 01/05/2002 4:26:45 PM PST by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson