Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SoothingDave
Here we go again with "the Scriptures." It isn't in your reading, but the meaning of the keys is clear to me, as is Jesus's threefold charge of Peter (and only Peter) to tend to His flock.

All bunk. No threefold charge and no exclusive all powerful role for Peter. Sorry, it isn't there. It isn't supported in the entire rest of the NT books. And it doesn't hold water under contextual scrutiny. Context is the bain of philosophy. Everytime it is produced, it's got the same effect on you guys as sunlight on Vamps. You welcome sunlight until it comes, then hide from it.

31,888 posted on 03/05/2002 8:55:02 AM PST by Havoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31881 | View Replies ]


To: Havoc
All bunk. No threefold charge and no exclusive all powerful role for Peter. Sorry, it isn't there.

Rather than continuing on with me saying "yes it is," let's just stop this particular line of questioning.

SD

31,898 posted on 03/05/2002 9:16:18 AM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31888 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson