Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SoothingDave
This is making the implication that Catholics believe that Peter and the popes are "successors" to Jesus. And that we beleive that Jesus is dead.

Didn't say you think he's dead - merely that you can't act as though he is. He didn't appoint anyone to hold the reigns for him, so to speak. He did train a lot of men to spread his message - Quite a large number, actually. But he set 12 special men to the task of winning the twelve tribes. He set one man to the task of winning the Gentiles. He set no one over them save for Himself. How does anyone purport to say they are an intermediary for the one who came to be the intermediary. That is usurpation of title - pure and simple. It was never stated, never defined, never commanded and never witnessed. It has been alleged and is presently no more credible than that statement that an elephant ran under the chair (in pardoning oneself for gas). Certainly has no more proof.

31,883 posted on 03/05/2002 8:34:59 AM PST by Havoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31880 | View Replies ]


To: Havoc
I am wondering why you think Jesus did not give the "Keys to the Kingdom" to all of the apostles? Why did he hand them over to just one of them?
31,885 posted on 03/05/2002 8:50:48 AM PST by american colleen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31883 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson