Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: american colleen
I will get back to you. The citation I have turns out to have come from a book in our Mission library, not one I have in my own collection. I was able in my own library to find reference to some French scholars who have argured for the Orthodox rather than the Latin interpretation of Cyprian: John Meyendorff cites Be'venot's introduction and notes for De catholicae ecclesiae unitate in ACW 25. (Westminster: Newman, 1957), A. d'Al`es, La the'ologie de St. Cyprien (Paris: Beauchesne, 1922), and P.-Th. Camelot, "St. Cyprien et la primaute'," Istina 4 (1957) 421-434.

I think the specific source which quote's later writings of St. Cyprian was Philip Sherrard's Church, Papacy and Schism. I'll look on my way to my office tomorrow.

31,494 posted on 03/03/2002 7:40:47 PM PST by The_Reader_David
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31480 | View Replies ]


To: The_Reader_David
Thanks a lot. Don't go out of your way to find it and please take your time. I was stunned that you said St. Cyprian did not defend the "C of P" - I had always read that he had and, after your post, I could not find anything that stated any differently. If there are writings of his that I haven't seen contrary to what I have seen, I would love to read them.

Thanks for helping me out.

31,506 posted on 03/04/2002 4:36:13 AM PST by american colleen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31494 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson