Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OLD REGGIE
What exactly is it about the list of the Popes that makes you think that this historical fact is supposed to be a matter covered infallibly?

SD

24,251 posted on 02/05/2002 11:21:44 AM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24250 | View Replies ]


To: SoothingDave;PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
What exactly is it about the list of the Popes that makes you think that this historical fact is supposed to be a matter covered infallibly?

Where in the world do you get, or invent, the idea I think the "List of Popes" is claimed to be infallible? What historical fact? The fact there is no historical fact? The only "fact" is, there is no verifiable List of Popes. If I were a skeptic I'd say the list is fiction. I might go even further and suggest to Becky that Peter didn't know he was "Pope" because he wasn't during his lifetime. He was elected posthumously and he selected his "successor" posthumously.
24,258 posted on 02/05/2002 11:44:10 AM PST by OLD REGGIE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24251 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson