Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: trad_anglican
The Apostles elected Judas' replacement (actually drew lots from among nominees).

Do you believe they "cast lots" in the gambling sense? ie. It was pure chance that Matthias was chosen? This concept would be interesting if it also applied to the method of choosing the next Pope.
23,949 posted on 02/04/2002 12:35:37 PM PST by OLD REGGIE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23904 | View Replies ]


To: OLD REGGIE
Do you believe they "cast lots" in the gambling sense? ie. It was pure chance that Matthias was chosen? This concept would be interesting if it also applied to the method of choosing the next Pope.

I don't think they placed bets, but Acts is pretty clear that after they nominated two Joseph and Matthias, they prayed and they cast their lots and the lot fell on Matthias.

I think it is very interesting to look at this election method and compare it to modern methods. We Anglicans elect our bishops. While the exact method varies from one diocese to another, it boils down to majority rules. I don't know whether that's the best way to do it. I suppose in a strict sense it's not the biblical way, but I see it as an administrative issue rather than a docrinal one.

23,983 posted on 02/04/2002 1:11:31 PM PST by trad_anglican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23949 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson