Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: angelo
Actually, you are both right. 'Binding and loosing' does refer to interpretation of the Law. Now, the Law clearly deals with matters of religious obligation, so interpretation of the Law necessarily entails imposing and releasing people from these obligations.

The point I was seeking to make in the exchange is that Binding and loosing in the original sense would have allowed creation of new law *only* insofar as it was meant to clarify existing law. Is that not correct; because as of this date, that is my understanding of the matter. Which I don't mind researching further - not like there are no jewish rabbis in this town to ask LOL.

2,318 posted on 10/23/2001 11:57:40 AM PDT by Havoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2301 | View Replies ]


To: Havoc
Binding and loosing in the original sense would have allowed creation of new law *only* insofar as it was meant to clarify existing law.

This is correct.

2,322 posted on 10/23/2001 12:04:37 PM PDT by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2318 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson