Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: IMRight
Don't jump on me if this is a Catholic v. Protestant thing... but I thought they were still called "the twelve" when one had died and they were replacing him?

I don't see how this could be a Catholic v. Protestant thing. They all agree on the Apostles.

As to still being called "the twelve", I think, note I said think, the "twelve" refer to the original ones. I'm sure I'll be corrected if I am wrong.
2,305 posted on 10/23/2001 11:34:36 AM PDT by OLD REGGIE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2288 | View Replies ]


To: OLD REGGIE
I don't see how this could be a Catholic v. Protestant thing. They all agree on the Apostles.

Oh good... I thought you were laying some kind of trap for me (which I guess I'm about to step into).
The argument goes something like this:

If they were called "the twelve" even when there were only eleven, that implies that "apostle" is and office which is passed from person to person (just like the one who held the keys to the house in the OT was an office - starting to see the connection?). If "apostle" IS an office which is passed down, and we already agree that the apostles had authority (Paul spoke of it when choosing not to exercise it), and could speak infallibly (they certainly did when writing scripture)...then where did all the men holding that office go? You want some hints?

I've heard that some translations render that verse "the eleven" to avoid the argument.

After teasing two other posters, I'm going to hit "post" again since this didn't show up.

2,310 posted on 10/23/2001 11:45:35 AM PDT by IMRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2305 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson