Didn't say he was, merely asking. Quit twisting and putting words in my mouth. For which I'll expose your tactics later in this post.
You thought it was OK if some Catholic had previously called someone a dirty name.
I think you meant to say "if some non-catholic". Nonetheless, twice I told you I didn't think it was ok for that to happen.
Example #1: Post #1425 Not with him on this one. Just pointing out your silence when it happens on the other side. And, yes, you were around. Wasn't that long ago.
Example #2 Post # 1434 Which part of "I am not with him on this one" don't you understand?
If all you're gonna do is post at me and not listen to what I say I'm afraid I'm gonna have to expose your lies about what I said. Please stop doing that. It lays bare your disingenuousness when ya try to warm up to the non-catholics.
You may remember that the original issue was something a non-Catholic had posted that I felt was way over the line (no point in rehashing it, he apologized). I was concerned that my rebuke would be ignored because I was Catholic & he might not see me as a Christian brother. So I was calling you in for help. Instead of saying "Hey bro' that's a little extreme, I believe your initial response was:
No different than SoothingDave calling him an ---hole. Police your own and ya may have some credibility.
Not that you disagreed with what he was saying.
You and I passed the argument back and forth in the way you have depicted (although you conveniently forgot your first response to make me look bad?) and I believe I apologized in #1442.
My post (that you obviously seem to have some issues with), was an attempt (appearently a poor one) at humor which I presume was the tone of your initial respose (are you slamming the HS? or just me? or some such).
If that didn't come across well... it's probably my lack of eloquence, not your misinterpretation.