[Invincibly Ignorant]

Notice how I easily worked fecal matter into the conversation when refering to an animal but managed to avoid it when refering to the Savior of the universe? It's a subtle trick, but you may be capable of it too? Give it a try some time. If you really see the Lord in His handiwork...act like it.

No different than SoothingDave calling him an ---hole. Police your own and ya may have some credibility.

[Iowegian]

No different than SoothingDave calling him an ---hole. Police your own and ya may have some credibility.

That's a good point, I was offended by that and not one RC objected to it on the forum that I recall (it was probably done by freepmail), though I think SD did apologize for it later himself if I'm not mistaken.

[IMRight]

I don't remember being involved there... but I'm certain I wouldn't put up with someone calling another Christian an A##$ole.

But I also reject your premise. If one of you tells me to "eat s$%t", I will feel he is childish, and I may treat him appropriately. Similar language when referring to the Savior is not within several orders of magnitude. I'm dissapointed with your response - your acting like the liberals jumping to defend Clinton's actions by pointing at Newt as being just as bad - now see... that's an offensive statement that stays on this side of the line.

(JHavard - I hope I'm not making myself a hypocrite here - is there a comparison to my reaction to the "finger thing")