Posted on 10/15/2001 6:54:40 AM PDT by malakhi
Statesmen may plan and speculate for liberty, but it is religion and morality alone which can establish the principles upon which freedom can securely stand. The only foundation of a free constitution is pure virtue. - John Adams |
You should write a book about all this stuff you don't know.
The Orthodox maintain a valid priesthood and their sacraments are considered valid. Amglicans have some valid priests, but as a rule, they've made a big mess of it. Once they started "ordaining" women any serious effort to maintain a valid priesthood was lost.
It has to do with Apostolic succession more than with Peter or the keys. And very little to do with Rome. If Peter never set foot in Rome, there would still be priests descended from the Apostles. If Jesus came a few humdred years later, then Constantinople would be the seat of the only Church.
SD
How would you explain that fact that Jeroham got a letter from Elijah years after he had been taken away to heaven?
Poor mail delivery? He crossed over with Johnathan Edward?
Are messages from Heaven unheard of?
SD
SD
Mary is ever referred to as "Theotokos" or "Mother of God" in Scripture? Since it is not in Scripture, where does that originate?
The most common tile for Mary in catholicism is the Mother of God. The reasoning given for this is as follows:
"Mary is really the mother of Jesus; and since Jesus is God, Mary is the mother of her Creator.
Joined to Christ the head and in communion with all his saints, the faithful must in the first place reverence the memory of the glorious Mother of God and of our Lord Jesus Christ" (VaticanII documents, "Dogmatic Constitution on the Church").
The catholics say I have a problem because I see Mary as the mother of Jesus and not the Mother of God. That I am seperating Jesus in two when he is only one. Read the last sentence in the above statements of the catholic belief. Mary is the mother of God AND of our Lord Jesus Christ. Who is seperating now?
Becky
The Immaculate Conception is a more recent RC doctrine, formulated since they split with the Orthodox. I'll try to give you a more complete answer later today, but the short answer is that we don't agree with the RC's about their interpretation of inherited guilt for Adam's original sin. We don't believe in any kind of Calvinistic doctrine of "total depravity."
We believe that Mary shared with all men in the sinful state of the world, but that at her core she like all men also preserved the image of God. Since we don't understand sin the way that the RC's do, we don't need a doctrine that - to us - seems to make Mary in to something different from all others.
This is a big topic, and is connected to things like the fact that the Orthodox don't believe in purgatory and that the Orthodox don't believe that an un-baptized infant is eternally condemned.
"Mary is really the mother of Jesus; and since Jesus is God, Mary is the mother of her Creator.
Mary is the Mother of a Person who is God. That is the definition. Mary gave birth to Jesus. Jesus is a person who is truly God. Therefore, Mary carried and gave birth to a person who is God.
Joined to Christ the head and in communion with all his saints, the faithful must in the first place reverence the memory of the glorious Mother of God and of our Lord Jesus Christ" (VaticanII documents, "Dogmatic Constitution on the Church").
The catholics say I have a problem because I see Mary as the mother of Jesus and not the Mother of God. That I am seperating Jesus in two when he is only one. Read the last sentence in the above statements of the catholic belief. Mary is the mother of God AND of our Lord Jesus Christ. Who is seperating now?
LOL. I read it like this, and I bet the Latin reads the same way. The faithful must reverance the memory of the Mother of God and reverance the memory of our Lord Jesus Christ.
SD
On other words, the Orthodox don't believe in Original Sin (in the Latin sense) in the first place, so they surely wouldn't have a doctrine whereby Mary was preserved from it!
SD
Well if she's sinless she's way above me and any other women I know. Question? Did Mary realize she was a sinless human? If so at what point did she know it?
Becky
I think the problem is trying to apply logic to something that is not logical. How can you reason about a mystery?
LOL, well done!
Let me instruct you Angelo - Listen close.
One: Don't say "mystery". The NCs go bonkers.
Two: Most importantly. If we stop talking about things that are "mysteries".... the thread would dry up (except for the football arguments... can we move on to talking about the Padres now?)
I'm not sure. Certainly humility is involved in living a decent life, but she certainly could not have been unaware of her unique role. She did have an angel come and tell her she had received God's favor, after all.
SD
I think Scripture clearly shows that the Hebrews of that time used the "Middle School" system. Heretic! ;-)
SD
Blasphemy is like pornography. I know it when I see it. :-)
Seriously, we can use logic to lay out positions that we know are wrong. We know that anything other than affirming Mary as carrying God, leads to the logical conclusion that there was a time when the person of Jesus wasn't God.
SD
Assuming Gabriel appeared to her for the first time at, perhaps, 14-16 years of age. She could not have been unaware of her unique role before that? Scripture please.
Is he off FR completely? I know his old handle is not registered anymore. RnMom if you can get a message to him, tell him JWinNC was thinking about him. Tell him I wish him well and I'll remember his family in my prayers.
I'd love to hear from him. Thanks!
Peace,
JWinNC
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.