Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Neverending Story (The New Christian Chronicles)
Southern Baptists ending talks with Catholic Church ^ | 3/24/01 | AP

Posted on 10/15/2001 6:54:40 AM PDT by malakhi

The Neverending Story
An ongoing debate on Scripture, Tradition, History and Interpretation.


Statesmen may plan and speculate for liberty, but it is religion and morality alone which can establish the principles upon which freedom can securely stand. The only foundation of a free constitution is pure virtue. - John Adams


Thread 162
TNS Archives


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: christianlist; michaeldobbs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,921-1,9401,941-1,9601,961-1,980 ... 37,681-37,689 next last
To: the808bass
"In the end, Jesus was fully God and fully man"

On that point, I think we can all agree.

JM
1,941 posted on 10/22/2001 1:38:39 PM PDT by JohnnyM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1937 | View Replies]

Comment #1,942 Removed by Moderator

To: JohnnyM
Maybe I can clarify the viewpoints here. PNAMBC is not saying that Jesus was not God in the womb. She is saying that Jesus received his humanity from Mary and his divinity from the Holy Spirit at conception. When a baby is conceived it gets traits from both the father and the mother. So Jesus received His humanity (trait) from Mary and His divinity (trait) from the Holy Spirit. Jesus is 100% God and 100% man. He was 100% man and 100% God in Mary's womb as well, but He did not receive His divinity from Mary, but rather from the Holy Spirit. Receive here may not be the best term as it presupposes not having, but I hope you see what I am getting at.

Thank you. Yes I do see your point, but I wonder if any see mine. Theotokos does not mean that Mary created God, or gave Jesus his divinity, or any of those things.

Yet every, every, Protestant here objects to the term because of what it explicitly does not mean. I can accept that some untaught folks will misunderstand the concept. But why do those who are told exactly what the term means and what it does not mean insist on fighting against what it does not mean?

SD

1,943 posted on 10/22/2001 1:39:13 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1933 | View Replies]

To: al_c
OK, we have:

1. Satan is real.

2. He is the 'ruler of this world'.

3. His 'job' is to tempt us into sin.

4. His powers fall way short of God's, and he will never overcome that.

Anything else? Anyone? Or does this pretty much cover it?

1,944 posted on 10/22/2001 1:40:24 PM PDT by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1922 | View Replies]

To: OLD REGGIE
For the last time, what makes you think the word "brother" means "from the same uterus" when we know that the culture and language of Jesus did not use the word exclusively in that manner?

SD

1,945 posted on 10/22/2001 1:41:11 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1939 | View Replies]

To: PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
No man is able to stand before God and say that he turned away from God because God did not give any light.

"turned away from" does not equal "does not know anything about"

1,946 posted on 10/22/2001 1:41:17 PM PDT by al_c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1929 | View Replies]

Comment #1,947 Removed by Moderator

To: al_c
"At this point, I must again ask what of those who have never been exposed to any of this? Are they destined for eternal death?"

I beleive that everyone will be exposed to this at one point in their life. Romans also answers this question.

Romans 1:18-20
"For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, because that which is known about God is evident within them; for God made it evident to them. For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made, so that they are without excuse."

JM
1,948 posted on 10/22/2001 1:43:04 PM PDT by JohnnyM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1938 | View Replies]

To: the808bass
This was one of those things that I was trying to tell Dave about before. That when you start asking or looking at things like this you open Pandora's Box. There are somethings that I beleive God wants us to take on faith. But if a "Protestant" (how I hate that label:) uses that to answer a question from you guys you laugh and say it is a cop out. That's why I TRY to avoid those discussuions, but Dave is a very presistent person:)

BEcky

1,949 posted on 10/22/2001 1:43:31 PM PDT by PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1937 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyM
"For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, because that which is known about God is evident within them; for God made it evident to them. For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made, so that they are without excuse."

Keep reading ... Rom 2: 13-16

1,950 posted on 10/22/2001 1:44:38 PM PDT by al_c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1948 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
Why can't anybody answer this question? At least Becky had the honesty to say she agreed with both statements but didn't like the conclusion. What about you?

I believe this is what I said..

It is true that Jesus Christ is God the Son, and Mary was the mother of Jesus, but the New Testament does not even hint that Mary should be thought of as the mother of God. Jesus Christ, as God the Son, had no beginning.

What about all you Protestants? Care to take on the Catholic teaching on Theotokos, or do you like cuddling with your straw men?

Naw, we want to stick with this one because your having so much trouble with it.

BigMack

1,951 posted on 10/22/2001 1:44:49 PM PDT by PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1935 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
I have no problems with saying Mary is the mother of Jesus, but the RC doctrine states, correct me if I'm wrong, that Mary had to have been sinless in order to conceive Jesus in her womb, which implies that she passed on divinity to Christ, which is what I object to.

JM
1,952 posted on 10/22/2001 1:48:12 PM PDT by JohnnyM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1943 | View Replies]

To: al_c
Creation itself speaks of God. Even if you have not been told, or read about him he is revealed in creation. What the person does with that revelation is between the person and God.

Becky

1,953 posted on 10/22/2001 1:49:50 PM PDT by PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1946 | View Replies]

To: PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
Theotokos

You may already have, but could you define this word?

Theotokos literally, in Greek, means "God bearer" as in "one who carries" as in "to carry a child" as in "to be the mother of." The translation into "mother" is the problematic one for most and may be more of an English thing than Greek.

What it asserts is that Mary had in her womb a person who was God.

That's it. Mary carried God. She did not create God, she did not exist before God, she is not due an honor higher than God's. When God decided, actually when the Second Prrson of God decided, to become man he chose Mary to bring Him into the world. Mary gave birth to a person who is God.

The pronouncement of this doctrine arose from people denying that Jesus was God, or was eternally God (that Jesus "became" God at some point of his life, etc.) It is meant to show that at no time was there a person named Jesus who was only human. From His Conception He was a person both human and God.

SD

1,954 posted on 10/22/2001 1:50:06 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1940 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyM
On that point, I think we can all agree.

Ahem... ;o)

1,955 posted on 10/22/2001 1:55:02 PM PDT by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1941 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyM
I have no problems with saying Mary is the mother of Jesus, but the RC doctrine states, correct me if I'm wrong, that Mary had to have been sinless in order to conceive Jesus in her womb, which implies that she passed on divinity to Christ, which is what I object to.

Mary did not "pass on" divinity to Jesus. Mary is not divine!

Mary was preserved from Original Sin, the blot on all of us from Adam's sin. It would not be fitting that God be born subject to sin, in fact it makes no sense to speak of a God who has a nature or a tendency to sin. So Mary, who was to serve as God's "home" for 9 months did not have Original Sin to pass on to Jesus.

Mary being made free from OS is not why Jesus is God. Rather Jesus being God is why Mary was made free from OS. To be a worthy resting place for God himself.

(BTW, being without sin is a necessary condition of one who is divine. But it is not sufficient. A human without any sin is still human. Adam and Eve did not have OS to pass on to their children. And if they had not sinned their children would not have OS. But it doesn't make Adam and Eve, or Mary divine.)

SD

1,956 posted on 10/22/2001 1:55:42 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1952 | View Replies]

To: JWinNC
A sad condition among many of our local churches; too much PC, too little JC.

Hey, I like that statement, can I use it? To your question, every church I have been a part of has women as deaconesses and some teachers (to children and other women) but other leaders (pastors, elders and deacons) are men. Welcome and jump in anytime.

1,957 posted on 10/22/2001 1:56:28 PM PDT by Iowegian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1901 | View Replies]

To: angelo
We should probably add something as to Satan being very charming and deceptive.

SD

1,958 posted on 10/22/2001 1:58:49 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1944 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyM
Do you think this passage has any bearing on the question regarding those who have never heard the gospel?

[14] When Gentiles who have not the law do by nature what the law requires, they are a law to themselves, even though they do not have the law. [15] They show that what the law requires is written on their hearts, while their conscience also bears witness and their conflicting thoughts accuse or perhaps excuse them (Romans 2:14-15)

1,959 posted on 10/22/2001 1:58:59 PM PDT by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1948 | View Replies]

To: hopefulpilgrim
I almost forgot, today's Sentence of the Day

Relatively speaking, there is very little in the scriptures which is difficult to comprehend once it is translated into one's own language.

SD

1,960 posted on 10/22/2001 1:59:58 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1955 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,921-1,9401,941-1,9601,961-1,980 ... 37,681-37,689 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson