Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iraq behind US anthrax outbreaks
The Observer (UK) ^ | 10/14/01 | David Rose and Ed Vulliamy

Posted on 10/13/2001 11:30:41 PM PDT by geros

Iraq 'behind US anthrax outbreaks'

· Pentagon hardliners press for strikes on Saddam

· Britain's GPs put on full alert over deadly disease

War on Terrorism: Observer special

David Rose and Ed Vulliamy, New York Sunday October 14, 2001 The Observer

American investigators probing anthrax outbreaks in Florida and New York believe they have all the hallmarks of a terrorist attack - and have named Iraq as prime suspect as the source of the deadly spores.

Their inquiries are adding to what US hawks say is a growing mass of evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved, possibly indirectly, with the 11 September hijackers.

If investigators' fears are confirmed - and sceptics fear American hawks could be publicising the claim to press their case for strikes against Iraq - the pressure now building among senior Pentagon and White House officials in Washington for an attack may become irresistible.

Plans have been discussed among Pentagon strategists for US air strike support for armed insurrections against Saddam by rebel Kurds in the north and Shia Muslims in the south with a promise of American ground troops to protect the oilfields of Basra.

Contact has already been made with an Iraqi opposition group based in London with a view to installing its members as a future government in Baghdad.

Leading US intelligence sources, involved with both the CIA and the Defence Department, told The Observer that the 'giveaway' which suggests a state sponsor for the anthrax cases is that the victims in Florida were afflicted with the airborne form of the disease.

'Making anthrax, on its own, isn't so difficult,' one senior US intelligence source said. 'But it only begins to become effective as a biological weapon if they can be made the right size to breathe in. If you can't get airborne infectivity, you can't use it as a weapon. That is extremely difficult. There is very little leeway. Most spores are either too big to be suspended in air, or too small to lodge on the lining of the lungs.'

As claims about an Iraqi link grew, senior health officials in Britain revealed they warned all the country's GPs last week to be vigilant about the disease. 'I think we have to be prepared to think the unthinkable,' said the Government's Chief Medical Officer, Dr Liam Donaldson. The Department of Health confirmed the Government is conducting an urgent review of Britain's ability to cope with chemical or biological attacks.

It also emerged last night that three people who worked in the Florida buildings at the centre of anthrax scares are now in the UK and undergoing tests for the disease. And in America a letter sent from Malaysia to a Microsoft office was found to contain traces of anthrax.

In liquid form, anthrax is useless - droplets would fall to the ground, rather than staying suspended in the air to be breathed by victims. Making powder needs repeated washings in huge centrifuges, followed by intensive drying, which requires sealed environments. The technology would cost millions.

US intelligence believes Iraq has the technology and supplies of anthrax suitable for terrorist use. 'They aren't making this stuff in caves in Afghanistan,' the CIA source said. 'This is prima facie evidence of the involvement of a state intelligence agency. Maybe Iran has the capability. But it doesn't look likely politically. That leaves Iraq.'

Scientists investigating the attacks say the bacteria used is similar to the 'Ames strain' of anthrax originally cultivated at Iowa State University in the 1950s and later given to labs throughout the world, including Iraq.

According to sources in the Bush administration, investigators are talking to Egyptian authorities who say members of the al-Qaida network, detained and interrogated in Cairo, had obtained phials of anthrax in the Czech Republic.

Last autumn Mohamed Atta is said by US intelligence officials to have met in Prague an agent from Iraqi intelligence called Ahmed Samir al-Ahani, a former consul later expelled by the Czechs for activities not compatible with his diplomatic mission.

The Czechs are also examining the possibility that Atta met a former director of Saddam's external secret services, Farouk Hijazi, at a second meeting in the spring. Hijazi is known to have met Bin Laden.

It was confirmed yesterday that Jim Woolsey, CIA director from 1993 to 1996, recently visited London on behalf of the hawkish Defence Department to 'firm up' other evidence of Iraqi involvement in 11 September.

Some observers fear linking Saddam to the terrorist attacks is part of an agenda being driven by US hawks eager to broaden the war to include Iraq, a move being resisted by the British government.

The hawks winning the ear of President Bush is assembled around Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, his deputy Paul Wolfowitz, and a think tank, the Defence Policy Advisory Board, dubbed the 'Wolfowitz cabal'.

Their strategy to target Iraq was hammered out at a two-day seminar in September, of which the dovish Secretary of State Colin Powell had no knowledge.

The result was a letter to President Bush urging the removal of Saddam as a precondition to the war. 'Failure to undertake such an effort,' it said, 'will constitute a decisive surrender in the war against terrorism'.

In a swipe at Powell's premium on coalition-building, it continues: 'coalition building has run amok. The point about a coalition is "can it achieve the right purpose?" not "can you get a lot of members?"'

Administration officials close to the group told The Observer : 'We see this war as one against the virus of terrorism. If you have bone marrow cancer, it's not enough to just cut off the patient's foot. You have to do the complete course of chemotherapy. And if that means embarking on the next Hundred Years' War, that's what we're doing.'


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
Comment #41 Removed by Moderator

To: CommiesOut
As far as I can tell, the amounts of anthrax used so far are very small. Such would be an amount easily stolen or simply purchased by bribing a complicit officer. That Iraq produced the material is likely. Whether or not they wittingly supplied it for use against the US is obviously still in doubt.
42 posted on 10/14/2001 7:52:20 AM PDT by Carry_Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: geros
It has always been the stated policy that if The United States or American troops were attacked with chemical of biological weapons, we would respond with nuclear weapons.

I hope this was not an idle threat and I think now is the time to prove that it wasn't. Nothing, NOTHING, takes the starch out of the shorts of a militant like a couple of nukes, - ask the Japanese.

43 posted on 10/14/2001 8:32:24 AM PDT by The Sons of Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_Member428
At any rate, I'd hate to ever find out that China is somehow involved. It would scare the crap out of me, and every proponent of freedom around the world.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/fr/547649/posts
The fact is, the Communist Chinese government is in bed with every one of the terrorist and terrorist-supporting rogue regimes (is it not now time that we dispose of the laughable "countries of concern" nonsense?) of the Middle East.

China's alliance with major rogue regimes has been so extensive and so well known for so long that it is absurd to pretend otherwise. Indeed, it is equally absurd to expect assistance against terrorism from a regime that has supplied nuclear and missile technology to Pakistan and Iran, chemical weapons materials to Iran, missile technology to Libya and air defense equipment to help Iraq shoot down U.S. pilots, all of which China has done.

Less well known is that the Chinese government is one of the foremost benefactors of Afghanistan's ruling Taliban, the focus of so much of U.S. attention since Sept. 11. Moreover, China is the largest foreign investor in Afghanistan.

On Sept. 11, Pakistan's Frontier Post reported that the Chinese and Afghani governments had signed a new economic and technical cooperation agreement. A defense cooperation agreement was signed in 1998 after Taliban officials allowed Chinese scientists to inspect unexploded cruise missiles that had been fired on Afghanistan in retaliation for Osama bin Laden's attacks on U.S. embassies in Africa.

-Senator Jesse Helms
Oct. 14, 2001 (Washington Times)

44 posted on 10/14/2001 11:25:14 AM PDT by shezza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Hillary 666
It's really too bad that 7,000 dead Americans has still not mobilized us to true war. It may happen after we have taken some more hits.

I have been thinking the VERY SAME thing! It amazes me and frankly, I think that for many people New York and D.C. are still very far off places. The P.C., "sensitive" atmosphere has become so pervasive, that rational thought is no longer possible among the Sheeple. Terrorist activity is going to have to hit every one of them in some personal way before the war becomes a national battle cry. Heck, even at that, there have been widows whining on CNN that even though they lost their husbands they don't believe "war is the answer." Duh and sheesh!

45 posted on 10/14/2001 12:32:22 PM PDT by PLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: geros
..... linking Saddam to the terrorist attacks [[Will hopefully] broaden the war to include Iraq, a move being resisted by the British government .....

Might be time to trim the Brits back down to size, then -- and tell them to put their aeroplane back in its hanger -- and their boat back in its pond.

46 posted on 10/14/2001 12:33:38 PM PDT by Brian Allen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: woofer
the strain was developed at the University of Iowa in the '50s

The correct name of the school where the anthrax was developed is "Iowa State University." The location is Ames, Iowa.

The University of Iowa is located in Iowa City, Iowa.

The state is clearly divided into Hawkeyes (University of Iowa) and Cyclones (Iowa State) when the teams play against each other. Otherwise, Iowans pretty much cheer for whichever team is playing.

47 posted on 10/14/2001 12:38:31 PM PDT by PLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: shezza
After reading what Sen. Jesse Helms had to say, things are starting to look bleak. If a connection to Sept 11th is found, would the govt keep it under wraps in order to keep us out of a war with China, or would it make it publically known? And then, would we be willing to engage China? I have the feeling that even if it were made public that China definitely played a supportive role in 911, there wouldn't be much support for going after China, even in this country. Such a conflict would be huge, long, hard, and bloody. One then must ask the question: how many deaths does it take to get us to engage China?
48 posted on 10/15/2001 3:03:31 AM PDT by VRWC_Member428
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

Comment #49 Removed by Moderator

Comment #50 Removed by Moderator

To: geros
Their inquiries are adding to what US hawks say is a growing mass of evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved, possibly indirectly, with the 11 September hijackers.

That is true, he was possibly indirectly involved. Why don't we just nuke the whole country and be done with him, that filthy Nazi.

51 posted on 10/16/2001 8:08:28 PM PDT by malarski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shezza
China does not like the Northern alliance because it includes some of the same moslem ethnic groups who are opposed to Chinese control of Xinjiang. Their motivation for supporting the Taliban may be based on the principle that "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" rather than a conspiracy against the United States.
52 posted on 10/16/2001 8:49:59 PM PDT by ganesha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson