[The Kitten]

We need better evidence than this. And Wolfowitz from day one has been trying to get us into a war with Iraq. Like the Muslims at this point, we need proof.

[Diogenesis]

Would you prefer to wait until Smallpox is placed here?

A few tactical nukes are far better than that virus loose.

[The Real Deal]

We need better evidence than this. And Wolfowitz from day one has been trying to get us into a war with Iraq. Like the Muslims at this point, we need proof.

Just how much proof do you think it should take. 100,000 dead, or would it take 1,000,000. Just wondering.

[Bogie]

#21

Right. But there are a number of places in this world that need attention. Israel is one of them, for sure. Also Indonesia, ect. The list goes on.

For now however, Osama is the man, and the Taliban is the faction.

Never split your forces!

[Roebucks]

Though I understand your sentiment, we actually don't need any evidence at all, including this. The reason is that we already have sufficient reason to take Saddam out. We have proof that he was a party to the 1st WTC bombings. We need no additional proof of anything to go after him.

We are at war. War time decisions are not equivalent to court case evidentiary proceedings.

If Saddam is at all linked to the anthrax mailings, he's toast.

[habs4ever]

Why do we need such proof that it would take skeptical journalists to climb on board? and just because Wolfowitz is eager, doesn't make it wrong.Maybe he's better informed than any of us, and shrewder too.Go ask Cap Weinberger what he thinks...he's in the phone book, I believe :-)