Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saudi Prince Threatens Payback for Giuliani Snub (posted 10/12/01)
newsmax ^ | Oct. 12, 2001 | newsmax

Posted on 10/12/2001 7:07:45 AM PDT by callisto

Billionaire Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal suggested Friday that he'll make New York pay a price for Mayor Rudy Giuliani's refusal to accept his $10 million dollar check for the Twin Tower relief fund, saying he's ready to "put his money where is mouth is."

The Saudi prince contributed the big bucks after Giuliani gave him a tour of the World Trade Center disaster site Thursday. Bin Talal said at the time, "Saudi Arabia is with the United States wholeheartedly."

But hours later the wealthy Arab released a statement saying:

"I believe the the government of the United States should reexamine its policies in the Middle East and adopt a more balanced stance towards the Palestinian cause. Our Palestinian brethren continue to be slaughtered at the hands of the Israelis while the rest of the world turns the other cheek."

Upon hearing about the bin Talal's press release, Giuliani condemned the statement as "highly irresponsible and very, very dangerous." Hizzoner's aides returned the Saudi's money after determining that his check had not yet been cashed.

The mayor's snub prompted the Saudi prince to leave in a huff for home, where he spoke to NBC's Andrea Mitchell.

"He's not backing down," Mitchell told radioman Don Imus Friday morning. "He says he has a big stake in New York (and) he puts his money where his mouth is."

Bin Talal's financial stake in the Big Apple includes a $10 billion investment in banking giant Citicorp, half ownership of the Plaza Hotel, substantial investments in the Saks Fifth Avenue department store and NewsCorp., the parent company of the New York Post and the Fox News Channel.

He also has part of his $20 billion personal fortune invested in AOL Time Warner, Apple Computer.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-157 next last
To: finnman69
It is interesting to note that most of the royal family has fled. Why do rats jump a sinking ship? The people have a right to be upset with the Al Saud family, each and every princess and princeling gets 5,000 a month for just being part of the royal family. Some allowance?
61 posted on 10/12/2001 7:49:46 AM PDT by MI-WAC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: culpeper
"LETS START DRILLING IN ALASKA NOW"

We can't. The sympathizer/supporter of Bin Laden Terrorist Taliban organization Senator Dascle squelched the bill to start drilling in committee just yesterday.

62 posted on 10/12/2001 7:50:27 AM PDT by putupon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: callisto
The pr*ck of a Prince should use a few of his billion to stake off a Palestinian home land in the Arabian sandbox some where. Problem solved!
63 posted on 10/12/2001 7:54:48 AM PDT by F.J. Mitchell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sargon
I agree it would be great if Rudy and the Saudi Prince mended fences--but that would require a retraction/apology from the Prince, and I doubt seriously that will happen.

To accept the money after the Prince blamed the U.S. Middle East policies for the terrorist attacks only serves to legitimize the "blame the U.S. first" mentality. Rudy was absolutely correct in rejecting the $10 million dollars.

64 posted on 10/12/2001 7:56:05 AM PDT by RooRoobird14
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: callisto
Did anyone else think that Prince whatzhizname looks like Father Guido Sarducci?
65 posted on 10/12/2001 8:00:31 AM PDT by financeprof
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: putupon
Or utilize that secret engine "kill" feature that is activated by the push of a button.
66 posted on 10/12/2001 8:00:41 AM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: callisto
Isn't the prince's actions just exactly what the Muslim Conference decided to do the other day (Bush's comments not withstanding)? They were going to protest American policy in the Middle East by boycotting certain American business interests. It should get interesting if he pulls out of or ties up his communication contracts. His financial involvement with several of these companies might also explain some of their coverage, too.
67 posted on 10/12/2001 8:01:16 AM PDT by wjeanw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WatchOutForSnakes
Bush has to play diplomacy - Rudy can tell it like it is.

Can someone tell this Aussie - is Rudy a Republican or a Democrat?

68 posted on 10/12/2001 8:02:16 AM PDT by anapikoros
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
Re: Drilling in Alaska

How about we take some big oil rigs, the floating kind, and
park them in international waters just of the Saudi coast.
Then with horizontal-directional-drilling technology, we could suck all the oil we wanted right out
from under their sand covered noses.

69 posted on 10/12/2001 8:05:29 AM PDT by tractorman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: callisto
Sheesh!! We all should tremble!!

What if he decides to destroy the World Trade Center by crashing two jetliners into them? What if he decides to take it out on the Pentagon in similar fashion?

Where, oh where, is Carlos Hatchcock now that we really need him??

70 posted on 10/12/2001 8:08:20 AM PDT by tracer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #71 Removed by Moderator

To: sargon
If every hostile (to the point of endorsing terrorism) Islamic extremist was killed, that would not solve the problem. New recruits and sympathizers would simply fill the void.

The problem is that Saud and Egypt and the other Arab states allow terror cells which agitate against the US to flourish, as long as they dont threaten their regimes.A sort of relief valve that threatens us, not them

They could assimilate displaced "persons" within their regimes (ie Palestinians) and of course "discourage" religious "schools" from selling their hateful propaganda (like how neat it is to be a martyr). And so on

Yes, there will always be fundamentalists. But look at Turkey and Khrgystan and Tunisia. Those types are "out of favor" there, for the most part

The Arab regimes are the problem. Either they straighten up and find a spine, or maybe we quit "protecting" them. Its Typical behavior, thinking you can have it both ways...

72 posted on 10/12/2001 8:09:42 AM PDT by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: callisto
This guy would be living in an apartment in Paris looking over his shoulder all the time if we let the fundamentalists take over his country.
73 posted on 10/12/2001 8:11:49 AM PDT by breakem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: callisto
If it wasn't for America building the oil fields in the first place this Saudi prince would be digging sand out of the crack of his *ss and picking fleas off of his friggin camel! I'll take the free country of Israel over the stinkin dictatorship of Saudi Arabia anytime! Take your dirty money and put it where the sun don't shine prince Abdul, we don't need it and it has innocent blood all over it!
74 posted on 10/12/2001 8:13:33 AM PDT by Walkin Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: D Joyce
So, then...you don't think the "prince" stabbing New York's largest contituency in the back two hours after trying to bribe them wasn't an insult, eh?
75 posted on 10/12/2001 8:13:33 AM PDT by Cyber Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: mijo, sargon
We must all try to perceive things from alternative viewpoints, not just with tunnel vision.

P!$$ on that. That's worked really well for the last decade, hasn't it? Now they can start "perceiving" things from our point of view or be damned.

Rudy had no right not to accept the gift and to insult the man that way. Foreign policy is part of the " big stick " and if not used fairly the rest will go by the boards.

PFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFT!!! :P

The Prince insulted US, and Rudy said "No, thanks". It was totally fair. And Rudy had every right to do it, and I support him 200% in this.

And excuse me, this was not "foreign policy" just because an a$$hole foreign "prince" came to MY CITY to make a LOCAL donation followed by an INTERNATIONAL press release designed to placate his homeys.

LOCAL matter. NYC. Rudy's call. Get it? I suppose you think Rudy had no right to throw Arafat out of that reception some years back either, but he DID. Deal with it.

Second verse, same as the first:
PFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFT!!! :P

76 posted on 10/12/2001 8:15:52 AM PDT by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
By "fast breeders" I'm assuming you mean breeder reactors to convert Uranium-238 into Plutonium-239.
77 posted on 10/12/2001 8:17:01 AM PDT by Bikers4Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: sargon
We must all try to perceive things from alternative viewpoints, not just with tunnel vision.

No, thanks. That's what got us into the mess we're in now.

78 posted on 10/12/2001 8:18:03 AM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: anapikoros
Rudy is a Republican, and a rather moderate one at that. I have been against his position on many issues, but in other areas THE MAN IS A ROCK and he has earned my undying gratitude over the past month.
79 posted on 10/12/2001 8:21:53 AM PDT by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: sargon
No. This was a calculated attempt to "buy" time on US TV to make a case.
Pretty crass coming from slimy corrupt Bedouins whose ass we saved and continue to protect.
I may not agree that we should continue to support Israel the way we have,
but the Arabs should not be stupid enough to believe that we will reward an attack on the US by changing our position re: Palestinian cockroaches.
We should be patient with Saudis- only because its one target at a time, not because they should be defended.
80 posted on 10/12/2001 8:30:16 AM PDT by ScholarWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-157 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson