Skip to comments.
Frist: Anthrax Attack Could Kill 2 Million
NewsMax.com ^
| Thursday, October 11, 2001
Posted on 10/11/2001 6:10:53 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
To: JohnHuang2
Interesting.
CDC says you couldn't distribute anthrax using a cropduster because the spraying mechanisws would destroy the spores to the point that they wouldn't cause the disease.
Now the question is, who's wrong?
To: JohnHuang2
I think the article is a little alarmist.
3
posted on
10/11/2001 6:16:56 AM PDT
by
jbstrick
To: JohnHuang2
John...
If this were to happen now, most of the Middle East would become a nuclear wasteland within days.
4
posted on
10/11/2001 6:21:23 AM PDT
by
cynicom
Comment #5 Removed by Moderator
To: JohnHuang2
I think I'm almost as alarmed by the panic being propagated as I am by the possibility of bioterrorism. I'm seeing a lot of genuine panic where perhaps simple vigilence would be a better course. Panic is often counter-productive, folks, and can even lead to worsening the situation. Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't the only cases of confirmed anthrax confined to one building in one city in one state? I think it's smart to be watchful, and smarter still to be prepared "in case"--but some of these threads on FR are just wild, blind panic.
To: JohnHuang2
I say we totally cut out the stem cell funding by the feds and put it right on the Anthrax path. I would much prefer 2 million healthy americans then using those stem cell lines with my taxpayer money.
7
posted on
10/11/2001 6:26:18 AM PDT
by
alisasny
To: golitely
I agree with you...there is a fine line here. The problem is, when Tommy Thompson comes on an hour after the first case and calls it "unrelated" (just about all of us knew it wasn't) makes us nervous. It's not what we know...it's what we are not being told that can cause us to get a little nervous.
To: JohnHuang2
Hmmmm....... if that happened in New York or Florida... would Oklahoma get it's lost House seat back??
Just kidding.
9
posted on
10/11/2001 6:28:40 AM PDT
by
kjam22
To: francisandbeans
Good post. I was thinking on those same lines. Something is up and your post sounds like that is
what they are trying to do.
10
posted on
10/11/2001 6:29:10 AM PDT
by
BearPaw1
To: francisandbeans
Right out of the 'Art of War'....maximize your weapons.By the time we learn it is too late. We need to remove the threat now, deport all foreigners who fit the profile of a terrorist, revoke all student visas, close the borders for 6 months to a year to get a handle on the problem. Close university research on anthrax and any other possible bio-terrorist hazards. Start acting like a country that is at war.
To: francisandbeans
Yes I think a lot of truth would go a long way in quieting the panic. People resort to rumors and hearsay when they have little else to go on. Just like they aren't reporting how many Arabs they are finding on the borders trying to come into the US.
12
posted on
10/11/2001 6:32:34 AM PDT
by
FITZ
To: JohnHuang2
I saw this interview. They had so little time to really talk about it adequately and Chris Matthew's was buttering up the Congressmen, that I think all the attention went to his head. You may theorically be able to produce 100 kilograms of the bacteria, but handling such a large amount of that stuff as it multiplies in such a way that it doesn't infect yourself in the process is VERY DIFFICULT. For instance, the case in Russia is an example of how it escaped its containment. Even if you are successful in making it, then you also need to continue that containment until you release it. Any releases along the way will cause outbreaks before your other release and will be a signal that anthrax is in the neighborhood. (This is from my Dad who is a research pharmacologist/toxocologist).
13
posted on
10/11/2001 6:33:03 AM PDT
by
wjeanw
To: TightSqueeze
How do we push for this? Are there any grassroots efforts in place now to get these people out of the U.S.? I'm serious, does anyone know?
Thanks.
To: wjeanw
I saw the interview, too. Matthews kept interupting. I think Frist was trying to make the point that -- while this horrendous, unimaginable scenario is theoretically possible -- it is extremely unlikely.
To: TightSqueeze
as far as I am concerned...we have done 2 things that were unexpected by Osama:
First, waiting nearly a month before counter attacking.
Second, the food drops on Afghanistan.
Neither of those things are crushing. Doing the unexpected is what is required for us to nip these guys. Deportation? It could fall under 'unexpected'...however, he may have cells here which have taken a citizenship oath. That what we have to wonder.
To: cynicom
If this were to happen now, most of the Middle East would become a nuclear wasteland within days. Absolutely.
To: JohnHuang2
It is extremely important to reiterate again and again, that any nation harboring or providing any support for terrorists will be severly attacked and destroyed. This will make terrorism much more expensive and unlikely,
To: francisandbeans
I couldn't agree with you more! I think the government (or at least Thompson) is definitely part of the problem. Nothing makes people more jittery than the appearance of hedging or outright lying. Thompson's appearance on one of the news shows recently was a disgrace, and an insult to intelligence: 7 trucks, he said, ready to go anywhere in the U.S. His grinning denials of danger probably did more damage than the worst terrorist propogandists could ever devise. I watched that interview, and I was not reassured. I think the people not only deserve the truth, but I think most of us can handle it--far better than lies, in any event.
To: golitely
Panic is often counter-productive, folks, and can even lead to worsening the situation. I disagree. Panic is good. For over 6 years, nothing we said woke up the idiots who adored what Clinton was doing.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson