[TommyDale]

FYI -- by the time you hear or see a B-2, it's too late. So no one is in danger from Fox News...There also are no anti-aircraft left for the enemy to shoot with. What's the problem?

[MississippiMan]

FYI -- by the time you hear or see a B-2, it's too late. So no one is in danger from Fox News...There also are no anti-aircraft left for the enemy to shoot with. What's the problem?

I'm certainly a FNC fan but it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out roughly when the bomber is gonna be over Afghanistan, thereby giving them time to move people and stuff that we'd rather they didn't move. They need to shut up.

MM

[The Duke]

FYI -- by the time you hear or see a B-2, it's too late. So no one is in danger from Fox News...There also are no anti-aircraft left for the enemy to shoot with. What's the problem?

Well, there's this little thing called "war", and it's not the the video game that we've come to think it is. In the world of a *serious* military you don't get access to information until you meet two criteria - the proper security level AND the "need to know".

Of course it's been a while since the US has been serious about its military, so your thoughts don't really surprise me.

[hoot2]

"FYI -- by the time you hear or see a B-2, it's too late. So no one is in danger from Fox News...There also are no anti-aircraft left for the enemy to shoot with. What's the problem?"

the problem is...we don't want "bin n the boys" to know when the bombers are going to be there,
we really want to spoil their goat bbq...