Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hole_n_one
I thought Anthrax was bacterial as opposed to a virus...
19 posted on 10/10/2001 5:14:18 PM PDT by Skip Ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Skip Ripley
My terminology may indeed be flawed.
29 posted on 10/10/2001 5:16:36 PM PDT by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Skip Ripley
CNN keeps fluctuating between the terms virus, bacteria and strain.
35 posted on 10/10/2001 5:20:23 PM PDT by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Skip Ripley; hole_n_one
You're correct. It is a rod-shaped bacterium. The rod is called a bacillus. The full name of the organism is Bacillus anthracis. Like several other bacillus bacteria, it can form spores when subjected to various environmental stresses. As far as I know, this is not a normal means of its spread. However, if the spores are formed (for example, in laboratory cultures under conditions favoring spore formation), these spores are inhalable.

This is how a person can get pulmonary anthrax rather than the more common and less serious cutaneous anthrax.

I gather from the available literature that the pulmonary anthrax does not promote further spore formation. Hence, pulmonary anthrax is not considered highly contagious.

58 posted on 10/10/2001 5:32:59 PM PDT by the_doc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson