To: My Favorite Headache
I still can't find out what was leaked. Was it leaked and not reported is that why?
everyone is up in arms about a leak that, as far as I can tell, nobody knows what the heck was leaked.
Any info would be helpfull.
To: big ern
I was not made aware of WHAT exactly was leaked. Just who leaked it out.
To: big ern
What I heard was someone high up in the Bush Admin. was able to talk the WASHCOMPOST out of writing about the some real senstive stuff.....what we saw in last Friday's Post was after W's team.....stopped the more damaging stuff..
34 posted on
10/10/2001 2:47:59 PM PDT by
Dog
To: all
as I said yesterday feinstein came on tv and said something about info being inadvertently leaked, the video showed her repeatedly putting her hand over her mouth and IMO looking guilty...how can you "inadvertantly release clasified material? wish I had a copy of her remarks.. regards.....
To: big ern
I still can't find out what was leaked. Was it leaked and not reported is that why? It must have been a real doozy because the White House asked the Washington Post not to print it when their reporter called about it. The Post reporter, at least, had a conscience.
To: big ern
I still can't find out what was leaked. Was it leaked and not reported is that why? Apparently some was leaked and published by the Washington Post - for instance the fact that there was a 100% probablity of another terriorist incident in the U.S..
Apparently some was leaked and NOT published by the Washington Post. The Post called the White House, either to get confirmation or to warn the White House. The White House prevailed on the Post to NOT publish.
40 posted on
10/10/2001 2:50:29 PM PDT by
jackbill
To: big ern
The first leak I believe was a few weeks ago when Hatch let the cat out of the bag that Bin Laden's cell phone had been intercepted. That alerted Bin Laden to the fact that he should not use that line any longer.
The second leak was a couple of days ago when CIA officials briefed the Senate Intelligence committee that there was a 100% chance of retaliation in the US for bombing afganistan. According to the poster above, that may have been Feinstein.
To: big ern
Any info would be helpfull. Any info would be helpful to the ENEMY.
To: big ern
... nobody knows what the heck was leaked. For which we can thank the WashPost's Bob Woodward and his colleagues.
They asked the WH if there was a problem printing the leakage, were told there was and spiked the story.
Give credit where it is due: The Washington Post behaved better than the leakers.
113 posted on
10/10/2001 3:44:12 PM PDT by
aculeus
To: big ern
IIRC it was a confidential briefing, from which some of the skinny was offered to Bob Woodward at the Post - whereupon he checked with the WH, and didn't publish it. AFAIK the only thing to "surface" from the briefing was the "retaliation is 100% certain after we bomb the Afghans" thing. That's knd of a "DOH!" thing...
221 posted on
10/10/2001 8:51:00 PM PDT by
185JHP
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson