Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: spunkets
"Your newest paper listed is from '96.

To date none of the work you've listed has been corroborated."

Your first statement is correct.

Your second statement is untrue,
and reveals you made no effort at all.

Your attack on US scientists and researchers is noted.

86 posted on 10/10/2001 4:27:25 PM PDT by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: Diogenesis
"Your second statement is untrue, and reveals you made no effort at all."

I made no effort? I told you there's been no corroboration of any of that work. If you think there has been, then post it. Perhaps, since you understand cold fusion so well, why is it that none of the experiments reporting excess heat from calorimetry give concurrent electrical energy measurements for the experiment? Hint to the significance of this question: w/o concurrent electrical measurements the calorimetry data is meaningless. The same sort of experimental ambiguity arose in the experiments reporting neutron fluxes, or isotope findings, there was poor control in the experiments.

88 posted on 10/10/2001 4:53:22 PM PDT by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson