Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SirCam Worm now circulating as: VALORES UNITARIOS
Email ^ | 10/09/01 | N/A

Posted on 10/09/2001 1:02:58 PM PDT by Coyote

Just a notice, for your etification:

Norton Antivirus just quarantined one of my emails coming in as:

Date: 10/9/2001, Time: 12:30:14, default on G0DF801 The email attachment VALORES UNITARIOS 2.doc.pif is infected with the W32.Sircam.Worm@mm virus. The file was quarantined.

I did NOT open it so I can't say what the message was, or whom it was from. I just deleted it and the attachment. Just watch the attachments. Mosquito bites are small, but given enough, they can bleed a person to death. The same is probably true of a nation.

I'm simply not opening ANYTHING that's suspicious. That's especially true of those business emails I've been getting in droves in the past weeks from the likes of Jamal, Haroom, and Achmed, trying to either sell me something, give something away, or get me involved in something patriotic.


TOPICS: Announcements; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:


1 posted on 10/09/2001 1:02:58 PM PDT by Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Coyote
The attachment always varies. It is a random file pulled from the senders hard drive and infected. The line about I send you this to have your advice is the tipoff.
2 posted on 10/09/2001 1:07:19 PM PDT by Excuse_Me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coyote, tech_index
Filing at tech_index
3 posted on 10/09/2001 1:15:21 PM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_Me
re: random attached file....

Well, I'm learning about this worm as I go. I upgraded Norton after 911 just in case. And I'm happy I did. SirCam looks to be a VERY bad one.

In this case, the attached file named was ALSO the SUBJECT name of the email itself, just to make that clear for anyone who might like to know.


4 posted on 10/09/2001 1:44:09 PM PDT by Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_Me
I've gotten quite a few. For the last one, I planned on sending it BACK to whoever sent it. NO 'from' address. Is there a way to discover WHO sent it, so that I COULD return to sender???

Another thing. I have ZoneAlarm as a firewall thingy. I KEEP getting blocks from a couple addresses that are the same. CONSTANTLY. The ZA alerts have said something about it possibly being code red worm. Is that a real thing? Never heard of it.

5 posted on 10/09/2001 1:53:17 PM PDT by mommadooo3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Coyote
The moral is:

1. Update your antivirus program regularly. At one time these updates were released monthly, then weekly, and in recent times almost on a daily basis. You are far less likely to get infected if you update, as your experience just proved.

2. Use a good firewall--either a mechanical firewall, or ZoneAlarm, or both. I use both on my computer at home, which is hooked to a cable modem. Although the mechanical firewall stopped everything from getting through for months, it failed to block a couple of attacks over the past week, which got through and reached ZoneAlarm.

3. Needless to say, don't override your virus protection in order to have a look at a suspicious message. If you think it is something from a friend that you would want to see, take note of the Subject and delete it anyway. Then ask your friend if he has done an antivirus check recently, and if he really sent this message or if maybe his machine was manipulated by a worm into sending it unbeknownst to him. If the message was kosher, your friend can send it again.

6 posted on 10/09/2001 1:58:38 PM PDT by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Coyote
I've received the SirCam virus 8 or 9 times and the W32.Magistr24876@mm virus a bunch of times. My Norton antivirus has trapped the virus each time. Since the emails that contain the virus are worthless, I tell NAV to delete the attachment, than I delete the email.

No matter which antivirus software you use, keeping your virus definitions up to date is essential. I update mine each Friday night along with backing up my files. I know a guy that updates his virus defs every day. Probably a bit severe but better safe than sorry.

7 posted on 10/09/2001 2:11:06 PM PDT by upchuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Use a good firewall--either a mechanical firewall, or ZoneAlarm, or both. I use both on my computer at home, which is hooked to a cable modem.

I'm still on a dialup. Is a firewall still useful when connected via dialup?


8 posted on 10/09/2001 2:27:34 PM PDT by Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mommadooo3
Yes ,code red is very real ,
it's the virus that preceeded Nimda.
Also,some email checkers will block if
the name of a known virus is in the
header or text of a message.
9 posted on 10/09/2001 2:29:25 PM PDT by damnlimey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mommadooo3
re: code red worm....

Apparently real. More HERE. Apparently attacks servers running under Microsoft OS's.


10 posted on 10/09/2001 2:32:55 PM PDT by Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Coyote
In this case, the attached file named was ALSO the SUBJECT name of the email itself, just to make that clear for anyone who might like to know.

It always is...

11 posted on 10/09/2001 8:54:24 PM PDT by Excuse_Me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mommadooo3
I've gotten quite a few. For the last one, I planned on sending it BACK to whoever sent it. NO 'from' address. Is there a way to discover WHO sent it, so that I COULD return to sender???

Depends on your mail program. If you show full headers, you can see where it came from...

Another thing. I have ZoneAlarm as a firewall thingy. I KEEP getting blocks from a couple addresses that are the same. CONSTANTLY. The ZA alerts have said something about it possibly being code red worm. Is that a real thing? Never heard of it.

Yes. But it won't affect you unless you are running a web-server. If you are running a flavor of NT (NT, 2000 or XP) but not a webserver, you will merely be a carrier. It will attack a lot of Cisco Routers, because they are web-enabled, but it just crashes them. Block that IP so it doesn't bother you anymore. The NIMDA worm is much more powerful. It will infect you if you merely go to a infected website using Internet Explorer. They both originated in China.

12 posted on 10/09/2001 9:01:52 PM PDT by Excuse_Me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Coyote
Yes. Even on a dialup. With my cable modem and my DSL connection I have a router which works pretty well as a firewall, but when I have to dialup I get plenty of attacks, mostly false positives, but if you play games on the internet, you've probably already been hacked.
13 posted on 10/09/2001 9:07:00 PM PDT by Excuse_Me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson