Link to: 
DIPLOMACY: KUMBAYA - Peace Vigil
:
Posted on 10/09/2001 7:57:22 AM PDT by Jean S
Maybe some people would feel compelled to ask the robber, "Why are you doing this? Why do you not respect my home, my life and my property? What did I do to you to make you this way? What did American society do or fail to do to make you this way?" Not me. Once they're in your house and threatening your life, the time for soul-searching is over.
"Then along came Rudy, vain, bull-headed, pugnacious -- and blissfully indifferent to the Root Cause crowd. At once, he went to work, determined to reclaim his beloved city. And (despite dire predictions from The New York Times, which didn't like him nearly as much back then) reclaim it he did.
In surprisingly short order, the squeegee brigades had been vanquished, Times Square was thriving, crime rates were falling, tourists were rediscovering the joys of the Big Apple, and liberal columnists were reduced to grousing that New York had become "too clean." "
Justin, she's talking about you.
There is a distinction between history and a fiction called "root causes". For the practice of history, see the brief review of the 60's in the preceding article (the one you just read.) The function of history, ably demonstrated here, is to identify past folly and past virtue in the interest of responsible living in the present. The function of root-cause-ology is to excuse folly, or evil -- the opposite of the discipline of history.
The "end of history" happens when a killer pulls a box-cutter on a historian and the historian takes a moment to analyze causes.
The logical culmination of "root causes" hunts can be seen in many places around the globe. In the Balkans, particularly the region once called Yugoslavia, grievances are passed from generation to generation like family heirlooms. "What you did to my great-grandfather, you did to me," the saying goes. Here in the United States, "root causes" rhetoric has given rise to predatory behavior that Americans of two generations ago would not believe possible, and to claims that white Americans who never owned slaves should pay slavery reparations to black Americans who never were slaves!
In the matter of the Middle East, everyone has a different "root cause," and all of them justify (by the propounder's lights) the extermination of some hated group. Well, if there's a group out there that hates Americans and wants to see us all dead, I think we should give them the chance to try their strength with us -- and that's exactly what they're getting now. But after the contest is over, I doubt there will be anyone to natter about "root causes" anymore.
Freedom, Wealth, and Peace,
Francis W. Porretto
Visit the Palace Of Reason: http://palaceofreason.com
Maybe so. But I've got $1,000 that says no leader in the USA will examine the root and do something to prevent this type of catastrophie from happening in the future. And I am not talking about Homeland SS as a 'solution'. In fact, I think this is exactly what USA leaders want! In the minds of Bush Sr., there is no problem. This is what they were expecting. Now they are simply moving on to the next phase of the plan. Bush Jr. is being used.
There are root causes and then there are root causes... One of the root causes of OUR behavior is simply our own understanding that if you attack America, you must die... It is not inappropriate that this be a key element of our foreign policy, only because it is a root cause of our behavior that others can easily understand, which helps to avoid confusion which can lead to making mistakes.
I'll take your root cause and trump it with mine while shoving yours where the sun don't shine...
This makes the world a safer place for all of us.
Not really. When staring down the barrel of a shotgun, you don't much care about the biography of the man who built the thing.
"Root Causes," when they exist, are fine and proper things to worry about, absent any imminent threat. Just not now.
When you stick your hand inside a hornet's nest, you are likely to get stung. That is a "root cause" anybody should be able to understand. But to point to this truism, these days, is to be accused of high treason, and worse, collaboration with terrorism. By pointing out that the bigger, and more sustained our intervention in the Middle East, the more we create a generation of Osamas, anti-interventionists (of the Right such as Robert Novak, Pat Buchanan, and others) are simply facing reality. It is a reality our troops will come up against if the "widen the war" faction led by Bill Kristol has its way -- and not just once, but again and again. Patriotism is a valid idea and a benevolent emotion: but when emotion begins to rule over reason, I fear for the national interest -- and the survival of our republic.
Actually, that isn't a "root cause" per se, it is an incidental cause whose effect is dictated largely by complex, often preexisting motivations. It doesn't take into account the instincts of the hornets, why they sting, if they've built their nest on property you own, or the costs for not dealing with them. If being stung is the only possible outcome of dealing with hornets, this analogy might make sense as a warning against all interventionist policy. But again, it ignores the costs of inaction once the hornets have already been stirred to anger, and it legitimizes the hornets' sting as a moral response, based primarily on geography.
I'd be interested in reading your take on our involvement in World War II. Do you have a link handy?
You crack about Neocons believing in the end of history is really quite ludicrous. I hope I don't make equally as silly comments about rather uni-dimensional isolationist libertarians. But I guess that also is in the eye of the beholder.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.