Judicial Watch Jumps On Record-Setting Bandwagon, Sues Barry Bonds and Major League Baseball

10/08/2001 | William Wallace

[Luis Gonzalez]

ROTFLMAO!!!

Ok, I'm outta here, got to work in the AM.

This was funny, great stuff.

I haven't had this much fun in weeks, thanks.

[Luis Gonzalez]

That's funny!!!

Great cartoon!!!

[Chemist_Geek]

Did you use 100% recycled electrons for posting this article?

[Victoria Delsoul]

You're welcome. :-)

[Victoria Delsoul]

Breaking,,, Judicial Watch sues William Wallace...

LOL!!!

[Luis Gonzalez]

"Which kinda made me wonder, is all."

It's rather simple actually.

When X42 was in the WH, it was rather easy for Larry to raise funds because we all hated the Bill and Hill show and would give money to anyone who said that they would sue them. We hated them because they are criminals who should be spending time in jail right now.

By the skin of our teeth, a decent man got into the Oval Office, and things are better, no more criminals in the WH. That doesn't mean that Larry and JW need to raise $12 million plus a year to live; and if they can't find criminal actions by the Admin., they will spin some into being because they need $$$.

[Luis Gonzalez]

"That doesn't mean that Larry and JW need to raise $12 million plus a year to live..."

Should read:

That doesn't mean that Larry and JW do not still need to raise $12 million plus a year to live;

It's late, got to sleep....

[Dr. Frank fan]

It's rather simple actually. When X42 was in the WH, it was rather easy for Larry to raise funds because we all hated the Bill and Hill show and would give money to anyone who said that they would sue them. [...]

Sigh. Well, that's kind of been my point. Thanks for verifying it. I guess. Later,

[Checkers]

Hilarious. Thank you.

Your subpoena is on it's way.

[Luis Gonzalez]

Well now, you just helped me prove a point. You are not really interested in WHY I am critical of JW, you couldn't be, I've answered that question already, and so did WW.

What you wanted was for me to answer for all the people whop are critical of JW, impossible for me to do, but once I made a statement closely resembling the statement that you have been fishing for, you smuggly proclaimed understanding, and huffed off. You are damned near as intellectually dishonest as JW.

Do you truly want to know why EVERYONE who is critical of Larry and JW think that way? Then you will have to each and everyone of them Doc. I gave you my reasons several times on this thread, not that I have to, I only need to justify my actions, and choices, to myself and my maker, certainly not to you.

So what have we learned here? That at least on this issue, I am being far more honest than you.

When Larry and JW do things that I approve of, I praise them, when they don't, I condemn them.

That's life Doc, if Larry doesn't like it, he should get the hell out of the public limelight he so loves.

Now, back to the fun at hand.

[AppyPappy]

Don't let Sinkspur see this. He hates when we eat our own.

[Luis Gonzalez]

Good Lord! You ARE Larry!

You spin better and faster than a loose hubcap on the beltway, there was another half to that answer.

Thanks for demonstrating my point so well.

[Scholastic]

Bump!

[Checkers]

...bump it up, way up...

[mountaineer]

Thanks for the ping, Luis, and kudos to William Wallace. This is true satire - just close enough to the truth to make one wonder. Considering the bogus causes of action Larry has brought in the past (yes, Dr. Frank, I am a lawyer), perhaps he could add a count against the fans for cheering too loudly whenever McGwire, Sosa or Bonds hit a homerun, thus unfairly encouraging them to break the Maris record and, quite possibly, violating some EPA regulation regarding sound levels at ballparks.

[Iwo Jima]

Great work! As Rush so often points out, satire is only humorous when it closely resembles the truth. That even JW supporters would think that this is true is certainly telling, as is the fact that so many people who know JW find it so funny.

How many times have we laughed about a fictional Klayman lawsuit only to discover in a couple of days that he has actually done such a thing? Bonds better consult his lawyer!

[Jean S]

I love it!

[William Wallace]

Thanks IJ, I'm sure JW won't disappoint us. :-)

[deport]

Great job of writing....... But following ol' larr around will give you things like this and they don't even have to be made up...

At the Judicial Watch Miami conference the day before the bombing, Larry Klayman pointed out that 16 other unfriendly Arab groups operating within the U.S. did not have their assets seized by President George W. Bush's unconstitutional orders to freeze those of organizations that have not even been indicted, much less convicted, of any crime.

Go larr Go, you da man..... Defend those terrorist and sue them at the same time.....

[Iwo Jima]

I just had a horrible thought. If it is true that anthrax can be spread via papers sent in the mail, try to calculate the widespread and repeated exposure which would occur if a terrorist introduced anthrax spores onto JW fundraising letters and press releases? I get two or three of those a week!

I hope that CDC monitors the JW mail room and printing press so that the bad guys don't take advantage of this non-stoppable delivery system which just seems to go on and on and on.