WARTIME MADNESS A world gone bonkers

Antiwar.com ^ | October 8, 2001 | Justin Raimondo

[Pharmboy]

Anyone who wants the US to do nothing supports the terrorists. End of story.

[MJY1288]

I hope there is an investigation into where this "Anti-War" group gets it's money and who funds them. I wouldn't be surprised if Justin Raimondo is directly funded by Osama bin Laden

[lavaroise]

I hope they realize that peace welfare has also its own costs involved. But if you listened to Libertarians, there would not be a single cop around in the US, just a patchwork of crime bosses sharing the spoils of the "peace dividend".

[Russ]

If this really is the "Age of the Nutballs" then Raimondo is at the top of the list. Beside that, his feeble attempts at humor aren't close to being funny.

[wideawake]

The problem with Raimondo and the rest of the jokers at Antiwar.com is that they can't tell the difference between a stupid, pointless war (i.e. bombing Serbia) and a just, limited war (our counterattack on Al-Qaeda).

The ability to distinguish between the two is essential - or else one morphs from an intelligent and realistic advocate of peace into a brain-dead hippy loser.

[MJY1288]

I couldn't agree more, People like Raimondo bring a whole new meaning to the word "Nut Bag"

[Pay now bill Clinton]

98% of their money comes from individual contributions from Americans citizens primarily in Silicon Valley.

[MJY1288]

Are they all card carrying supporters of bin Laden? or just confused little Communist?.

Their sister group A.N.S.W.E.R. is directly funded by the communist groups

[Publius6961]

It is difficult to imagine a sentient being not responding to being attacked.

To do nothing is both unnatural and the road to suicide.

[MJY1288]

Is antiwar.com a tax exempt group?

[Pay now bill Clinton]

I dunno Mr. Junior G-Man. Why don't you check out the site and find out yourself?

[jlogajan]

But if you listened to Libertarians

Raimondo isn't a Libertarian. He was a Buchanan guy.

Minarchist Libertarians accept the role of government as strictly limited to police, courts, and national defense.

This would appear to be a case of national defense. I'm a Libertarian, I have no problem with dropping bombs on bin Laden's head.

[lavaroise]

Appologies.

[MJY1288]

I don't like wasting time with the hopelesss, Mr. Antiwar

[Pay now bill Clinton]

So your earlier "questions" were purely rhetorical (or accusatory) and you were never acually interested in answers.

[MJY1288]

The question was to you, I figured since you spend so much time posting Raimondo's and the other antiwar journalist articles from antiwar.com, you would know. As far as visiting antiwar.com! I do as much as I can to avoid anti-american, anti-military, anti-war websites. But thanks for the invite

[Chapita]

Let's use our PC weapons of mass destruction on Bin Laden's bunch; queers! Or would that be regarded by the ICC as bio-terrorism?

Well, which is more fatal, AIDS or anthrax?

Then Raimondo can really be a C.O..

[Pay now bill Clinton]

But it seemed you weren't interested in the answers unless they confirmed your accusations/conclusions (they don't).

[D-fendr]

antiwar.com is a 60s redux "peace group." Either grossly misguided, dupes or an unaware front group.

In any case, those not for U.S. are for the terrorists. antiwar.com has been consistently opposed to anything western and pro-chinese. During Clinton they had some traction, today they are on their way to the dustbin.