To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
You ARE straining for an issue when you claim that it smells fishy, as are the others who are trying to string daily news events into a plot and then get suspicious when others deny a conspriacy.
the fact that there is no evidence hasn't deterred some of you from making some wild correlations. And remember, correlations, positive and negative NEVER imply causation. Never.
Of course, since I'm not promoting anthrax conspriacies, you'll probably consider me a government shill and part of the cover up.
(Maybe that's exactly what 'they' want you to think!)
To: Eagle Eye
The CDC would have been VERY interested in this anthrax case, no matter WHEN it happened. Terrorist or no, they would want to hunt down the source of exposure. Any given day, any given year.
To: Eagle Eye
Okay I will move along nothing here to see -or con spire but their can be cons spire ing- and buy a car and fly to the bahamas and have sex with Bart Simpson as you assure me life is blue water snorkeling with a pina colada,so very well.
BTW:Buy the Israeli gas masks (or the new military issued ones) and plenty of change out cartriges and make sure you fit them well to small children and wear them 24/7.
To: Eagle Eye
You are not contributing (promoting) to this discussion in any way. The discussion of facts in Post 109 is what I am doing (as best I can) while you accuse me of conspiring.
If you do not want to discuss why did you open this thread?LOL that you insinuate you could be a government shrill.You must have alot of time on your hands.
9785jjm87709mye,0-80t990,90r890e8r,e90fe8888_*$
Besides...I turned the government shrill tags off on post one...so I know you ain't one. Quit acting like everyones name is Bubba, Bubba.
< / Government Shrill >
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson