To: xm177e2
That'll be the excuse too. "we wanted to attack but we didn't want our troops to get COLD FEET in all that Afgan snow"
To: MichelleWSC
That'll be the excuse too. "we wanted to attack but we didn't want our troops to get COLD FEET in all that Afgan snow" Are you sure you're a conservative?
65 posted on
10/05/2001 2:56:36 PM PDT by
SunStar
To: MichelleWSC
So instead of bitchin' and moanin', why don't you grace us with what your plan of attack would be?
69 posted on
10/05/2001 2:57:56 PM PDT by
SGCOS
To: MichelleWSC
Don't mean to flame but the conclusions you and others seem to draw from a Clymeriated Presstitute article that says nothing are really quite simplistic. This ain't no one time bombing run type affair. Take a stroll over to Stratfor.com or read a little bit more on what likely/speculated plans are for this 6 to 10 year endeavor....
76 posted on
10/05/2001 3:05:12 PM PDT by
eureka!
To: MichelleWSC
"we wanted to attack but we didn't want our troops to get COLD FEET in all that Afgan snow" You insult our fighting men and women with your inane blather on this thread. When called upon, they will do the job while you whine behind your keyboard because your bloodlust isn't being satisfied quickly enough.
77 posted on
10/05/2001 3:06:11 PM PDT by
dirtboy
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson