I think this should read: We have been perpetuating terrorism for over 100 years. Especially considering Sharon precipitated the latest Intifada. See following:
"In the real world, Violence is not like the weather. Somebody does it, and we can usually identify the patch of clouds responsible for the rain. So it was, that when the ‘Mitchell’ process was invoked and the daily quota of killed slowly crawled down, the Jewish supremacists replayed the provocative visit of Sharon to the Haram a-Sharif by laying the cornerstone of the Third Temple.
Immediately after the cornerstone provocation, Israel followed up with a wave of assassinations in Nablus, Ramallah and elsewhere, trying to get Palestinians to respond in kind. It seems to be a pattern. Last September, after Sharon’s visit to Haram a-Sharif, Israeli Border Police murdered seven worshippers in the Jerusalem mosque and ushered in the second Intifada. Sharon’s assassins did not stop murders until a suicide bomber obliged by responding.
It is no coincidence. Israel wants the Palestinian uprising to go on. Israel wants not peace, but low intensity conflict. A war with Palestinians allows the Israeli leaders to keep their heterogeneous communities together, away from each other’s throat. What is more important, the war allows the Jewish leaders over the world to continue their arduous task of reviving World Jewry, a medieval run-down construct. That is why it makes no sense to speak against ‘Violence’ and for ‘Peace’. As long as the supremacist Jewish state exists, it will ensure violence and avoid peace.
The recent assassinations also had the intent of covering up the cornerstone provocation under a heap of corpses. The meaning of this obscure ceremony was further obscured by the mainstream media, and all references to it mysteriously vaporized. For instance, Reuters reported on August 3, 2001: ‘Israeli police stormed the Temple Mount, revered by Muslims as al-Haram al-Sharif, after Palestinians threw stones at Jews worshipping at the Western Wall below’.
Why, all of a sudden, did Palestinians begin to stone Jews? The cornerstone story was omitted, and the average American or European was left with the impression that the ‘wild‘ Muslims attacked peaceful worshipping Jews just out of spite. On this count, the unanimity of the English-language media was horrifying. The BBC, once more objective than American networks, closed the gap. They also reported of ‘Israeli soldiers who entered the mosques responding to the Muslim stone throwers’, moving a reference to the cornerstone to the end of the item. It now appears that the airing of the BBC documentary on Sharon was a singular act of courage that will not soon be repeated.
As for the American networks, their coverage continues to be consistent. They market the Israeli line without hesitation." By Israel Shamir from Cornerstone of Violence
You must frequent antisemitic websites. Those are the places that post articles by Israel Shamir, a discredited, antizionist zealot.
His articles are found on Radio Islam, Zundelsite etc. What is the URL or website where you found this article?
Israel Shamir has been exposed and discredited by pro-Palestinian activists like Nigel Parry. He's a fraud.
Jews have no plans to lay any cornerstones for a "Third Temple" nor is it the policy of the State of Israel to rebuild the Temple. In fact, the Jewish religion prohibits Jews from making any attempt to rebuild the Temple. Jews believe that the Temple can be rebuilt only by the Messiah.
The people who try to lay cornerstones for a new Temple are not "Jewish Supremacists," they are mainly Christians. Israeli police block them every time they try to do it.
Since 1967, When the Israelis captured Jerusalem, they have left the Temple Mount in the control of Muslims, even though they have the military power to kick the Muslims out and take it for themselves. Please explain why they have done that.