Replies

I don't think she is. Read her new story she is not letting up.

She is continuing to unravel. At the end, she makes some totally asinine statements about how Powell is going to admit Bin Laden into the coalition, as if Powell is in charge.

She has lost it for the moment and I hope she gets help and support from her close friends.

Egging her on (GO ANN GO, DESTROY YOURSELF, YOU ARE RIGHT, YOU CAN DO NO WRONG) is precisely the wrong thing at this point-- she is doing herself and her career great damage IMHO.

I think those of us that are urging her to show restraint are her real fans, not those just piling more fuel on the bonfire, like you TLBSHOW. Just my 1 cent.

But moreover, any sentient being has to realize that some of our "partner" regimes are more plausibly allied with the terrorists. If we don't stop the coalition-building soon, Colin Powell could soon be announcing a "diplomatic initiative" to bring Osama bin Laden into the "coalition." Having allies is great, but let us not forget that it is ultimately our responsibility, not that of foreigners with different interests, to defend this country.

Rob writes: "She is continuing to unravel. At the end, she makes some totally asinine statements about how Powell is going to admit Bin Laden into the coalition, as if Powell is in charge."

I don't see her final paragraph in "Detainment is Not Enough" as asinine [STUPID, FOOLISH], rather as apt.

Can we take seriously the administration's courting of Iran as a partner in our coalition against terrorism?

That, to me, is asinine, as is our insistence on dealing with Yassir Arafat--a terrorist.

Further evidence of madness is Hillary's comparison of her critics with Osama bin Laden--when she smooched Suha after Suha's blood libel, when she was Arafat's pom pom girl, when she concealed a 50K donation from the Hezbollah front American Muslim Council by instead listing "American Museum Council".

Powell has great clout--Rush Limbaugh to the contrary notwithstanding--and while he does not Run the Show, he is a force to be reckoned with. Indeed, would Bush have been elected without him?

So, I don't see Ann Coulter having a problem discerning between a hawk and a handsaw.

As a sidelight, I revisited that tiny mention of Barbara Olson in National Review and would think someone would write a suitable memorial--for her incisive exposures of the regime which still haunts us--but, like T. S. Eliot, I do not hope.

Now, if there's a tortured soul self-immolating from substance abuse and self-absorption, that would be Bill Maher, and, yes, to him I say, "You go, ghoul."

I think those of us that are urging her to show restraint are her real fans, not those just piling more fuel on the bonfire, like you TLBSHOW. Just my 1 cent.

No Rob you and the other so called conservatives look like fools just like National Review does.

Here is a great quote from PhilDragoo

I have his Radical Son and Politics of Bad Faith and friends came back from another of his weekends in Denver--he's a stimulant to the necrotic corpse of Republicanism, or conservatism, as you prefer.

Read it over and over and all you other necrotic folks should too. The new day has dawned.