Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AKbear
Most of the Anti-federalists were not on the front lines of the Revolutionary War. It was the shared misery and deprivation in the Continental army which formed the core experience of those who later became federalist. First hand experience with trying to maintain an army showed them that the Articles were worthless as a governmental basis.

Most of those paralyzed with hysterical fantasies about a permanent military were precisely those who did not serve in the army. For the armchair soldiers the Articles were fine. Those whose lives were on the line had a much different view.

51 posted on 10/04/2001 8:08:10 AM PDT by justshutupandtakeit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: justshutupandtakeit
You know, maybe it's just me, but South Carolina and Georgia leadership seem not to have had their hearts in the Union very much from the start. I mean, the more I read, the more it looks like they seized any and every opportunity to threaten dissolving their ties. Maybe I am wrong. But I think there were certain states who went along with it half-heartedly, but really resented sharing power with the other states.
58 posted on 10/04/2001 9:14:09 AM PDT by Huck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson