O'Reilly Baffled by Peikoff

FoxNews | today | me

[cinFLA]

Perhaps you should read up on international law that deals with terrorism.

[Lounyc]

im not interested in some outdated ignorant rant about ayn rands novels from decades ago. what i asked for was opinions from the freerepublic posters, (the ayn rand critics) what their problem is regarding the claims of kookyness, and cultishness. why do THEY think what they think?

also i should have mentioned in my previous post that i am behind peikoffs statements regarding dealing with terrorism 100%!!

[Capt.YankeeMike]

I think what he meant was, we HAVE been at war, WE just didnt know it. (but how could we NOT have known, OBL said he was declaring war on us!)

[wingnuts'nbolts]

Mr. Bill is a Moderate Libertarian no matter what he says and grew up on the tail end of the hippie era and Viet Nam.HARVARD GRADUATE! Been no real threats since then. Lets See how he turns out.

[UnBlinkingEye]

A kook is a kook. All the PhD's in the world will not change anything.

Peikoof wasn't just a kook, he was a wild-eyed ranting murderous kook as far as I could tell...

[UnBlinkingEye]

Me: Peikoff was saying civilians are legitimate targets in war, if that is true the WTC was a legitimate target. I disagree.

You: He did NOT say this. See my post #195, if you even care about the truth of what he said (instead of just trying to slime him and stir up debate).

I thought he did a fine job of sliming himself. I didn't memorize the interview, nor have I seen a transcript. If you can find a transcript of the interview I would like to review it, perhaps his fanatical persona colored my memory.