To: Mia T
It's fine with me to examine Clinton's complicity in wrecking our national security. Let's not fool ourselves about the complicity of Republicans,though, particularly when they controlled both houses of Congress. The last time I checked, Congress still had oversight responsibilities.
To: independentmind
You're right of course but in defense of the indefensible; look how impossible it was to get the electorate excited over articles of impeachment: perjury, subornation of pejury, and abuse of power? Trying to convince them that Clinton was a foreign policy catastrophe waiting to happen, and then linking this fact to amorphous characters possibly committing acts of terrorism on our turf. I ask you, what chance did they possibly stand? Americans' little grey cells are activated only by pictures, I'm afraid.
To: independentmind
It's fine with me to examine Clinton's complicity in wrecking our national security. Let's not fool ourselves about the complicity of Republicans,though, particularly when they controlled both houses of Congress. Slick was in on this too. It's called blackmail. Uncle Wee-Wee's first move as president was to silence the Republicans by stealing any FBI files he could find on them. As for the Republicans...Wonderful, ain't it, that we have such castrated paragons of virtue in Congress, that the American people go unprotected? Your tax dollars at work...
We need a thorough housecleaning in Washington. For a start, I recommend a government based upon a separation of money and state. Pull the money plug...i.e. end taxation, and you won't find any pigs at the trough because there won't be one.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson