Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

America's Most Justified War
StopDemocrats.com ^ | September 30, 2001 | Carlos Leon

Posted on 09/30/2001 9:28:44 PM PDT by Cuban123

America's Most Justified War
Carlos Leon

America has been involved in many wars throughout it's history. From the Revolutionary War when the Americans fought the British to the war in Serbia in 1999 when the U.S. together with NATO fought Slobodan Milosevic. Every war that America has fought is arguable to some people. Benedit Arnold became a traitor in the Revolutionary War when he committed treason against the US and one of the biggest questions about World War II is if Harry Truman did the right thing by dropping the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan. Conservative commentator Pat Buchanan said "If the United States is going to behave as a Roman empire, a global empire, what we saw at the Trade Center is the beginning of the price of trying to uphold that empire" in response to the fact that the US has contributed to foreign wars, Walter Conkrite said "'I think it's time for us to say we've done the best we could-money, materials, the blood of our soldiers have all gone into this effort ... we should seek an honorable peace" after coming back to the states after reporting from Vietnam on one of his national broadcasts on CBS, and most recently Liberal Representative Barbara Lee of California said "some of us must urge the use of restraint" and voted against giving President Bush the power to declare war. All of these people have not agreed with American actions regarding war. But the war that was started at 8:45 am Eastern time on September 11 in New York, the war that was declared on America on that day of infamy, is a war that should have no dissent because this new war is America's most justified war.

Those, like the ignorant Marxists that On September 29 protested the war in Washington and New York (of all places!), have to understand that this war that we are fighting is necessary. We are not intervening in some foreign land where we have some sort of interest (like oil in Kuwait) or helping some foreign group topple a dictatorship (like the Contras in Nicaragua in the 1980's). We are retaliating against a barbaric act on AMERICAN soil, against AMERICAN civilians, against AMERICAN landmarks, against America as a society and America as a nation. This event has never occurred in American history. The closest to it was Pearl Harbor when Japan ordered the bombing of the military instalation and killed 2,403 American servicemen. The toll in New York is already 5,219 (as of September 30) and this does not include the other 180 killed in the Pentagon, the 45 killed in the field in Pennsylvania, and the fact that among the victims there are both military personnel as well as civilians.

Many people argue that America will be seen as cruel if we bomb Afghanistan. That the goal of this war is to get rid of the terrorists and not a government. That it's impossible for President Bush to declare war when a country has not declared war on us. But the fact is that Afghanistan ,represented by the Taliban, has painted a very large target on itself for the past two weeks. While almost the entire world, both allies as close as Britain and former enemies as far as Russia and China, aligned itself with the United States, the Taliban sent a threat to the Arab world telling the countries that if they helped the United States in this war, they would declare war on them. The Taliban also rejected various requests by one of their closest allies, Pakistan, to hand over bin-Laden during several meetings. If the United States government never singled out Afghanistan as a terrorist state and never blamed them for anything, in fact the State Department did not include them as one of the seven countries that support terrorism in their 2000 report on States that sponsor terrorism, then why have they been so supportive of Osama bin Laden and why have they refused ,in such a vehement way, to help the US? Is it because they support Osama bin Laden and they support and harbor terrorism?, of course.

The Left argues that war will not resolve anything because Osama bin Laden is not the only terrorist and that by getting rid of him terrorism will not end. There is no doubt that terrorism will continue even if the US captures and kills Osama bin Landen but the question is to what extent. By getting rid of Osama bin Laden you are sucking out the air of the terrorist movement which bin Laden runs (al-Qaida). He isn't just a Saudi-born Millionaire who decided to slam a handful of airplanes into important American landmarks because he woke up one morning and felt like it. He is the leader of a world-wide terrorist network that bombed U.S. embassies in Tanzania and Kenya in 1998, bombed the World Trade Center in 1993, and blew up the USS Cole last year. This is a man worth millions of dollars that has set up terrorist training camps around the world since 1979 where he trains, feeds, and shelters these terrorists that are full of hate. By getting rid of him, you are getting rid of the leader a movement, the same way the Holocaust ended because Hitler was defeated, the Soviet Union broke up because Gorbachev resigned, Yugoslavia became a democracy after Milosevic was ousted by the people, and Peru rebuilt it's Democratic government after Alberto Fujimori was taken out of power for corruption. Anti-semitism still exists in Europe and elsewhere, Socialist politicians still get elected in some countries, and corruption still exists in Peru, but these things do not exist to the level that existed when these leaders were there.

This war that America is now in will be long and hard. It will affect the way Americans live, security at airports, military spending, security at major events, invasion of privacy issues, ect. This is why we must support the war whether the government uses diplomatic or military force. Americans cannot stand around and ask for "peace" while Osama bin Laden is planning more attacks against us. America must wake up to the fact that if we do not defend ourselves and show strong force against the terrorists and the countries that harbor them they will defeat us. We must support this war for the victims; the children, the firefighters, the rescue workers, the newly born baby named Hope that was not able to meet her father, the women that was unable to get married with her fiance, the man that lost both his sister and niece, and for America, because it is for these people and for this country that we must support this new war against terror, America's most justified war.

Carlos Leon is an 18 year old Cuban-American student. He is also the editor and founder of StopDemocrats.com, a conservative website.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

1 posted on 09/30/2001 9:28:44 PM PDT by Cuban123 (Cubanb13@aol.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cuban123,To All

Voice your support for President Bush in this challenging time!
2 posted on 09/30/2001 9:36:27 PM PDT by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cuban123
Excellent analysis especially from one so young.

He gets it. Afghanistan is a living "Lord of the Flies". The children are in charge with no adults in sight.

We have to be the adults that bring their reign of terror to an end, now and forever.

3 posted on 09/30/2001 9:38:04 PM PDT by Yellow Rose of Texas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68-69TonkinGulfYatchClub
Bump Tonk!
4 posted on 09/30/2001 9:39:08 PM PDT by Yellow Rose of Texas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cuban123
BTTT
5 posted on 09/30/2001 9:39:51 PM PDT by StriperSniper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yellow Rose of Texas,Cuban123
"Excellent analysis especially from one so young."

....and so wise I might add.
6 posted on 09/30/2001 9:42:50 PM PDT by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cuban123
Yes this war is justified, but so was WWII and the Civil War.
7 posted on 09/30/2001 9:43:30 PM PDT by RickyJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cuban123
Great Job Carlos, Keep at it, and encourage your friends to listen to you. We need more young men like yourself to support and promote conservative view points.

Great article :-)

8 posted on 09/30/2001 9:43:47 PM PDT by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cuban123
Bump for the young who get it.
9 posted on 09/30/2001 9:58:40 PM PDT by WIMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: Cuban123
a humble bow to your parents young man.Intelluctual thought looks good on ya !!!!!!!!!!!!
11 posted on 09/30/2001 10:00:55 PM PDT by cactusSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cuban123
War could not be more justified that it is right now. The others were justified but this one probably moreso than any other.
12 posted on 09/30/2001 10:07:47 PM PDT by boycott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boycott
that's exactly my point
13 posted on 09/30/2001 10:08:49 PM PDT by Cuban123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Layth
Layth member since September 30th, 2001
14 posted on 09/30/2001 10:09:33 PM PDT by American Soldier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Yellow Rose of Texas
Afghanistan is a living "Lord of the Flies". The children are in charge with no adults in sight.

Good comparison

15 posted on 09/30/2001 10:10:01 PM PDT by piasa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: boycott
War is fine, but slow down and do a little thinking. We may be committed to battle, but this isn't over at home yet. Here's the pertinent history and the inside skinny -

Start with the fact that the current hijacking procedures are left over from the 60's. Hijacker compliance was the best idea until 1995, when "Project Bojinka" was discovered.

While flight crews were advised of a "Muslim" and terrorist threat in the Pacific, none of the flight crews were advised that suicide takeovers were in the plans. I doubt that the threat was officially revealed to flight crews by the name, "Project Bojinka." I only heard the name through an ex-FAA security type.

While the same former FAA airport security agent raised hell all over Washington - for years, the best he got was to be charged through the FBI to silence him. Steve Elson is his name, he's been on TV a few times since 9-11.

The Philippine government had advised the U.S. on both the suicide aspect & the specific targets, but that was never let out - even on Internet accounts - until after 9-11. The Philippinos got mad and told the world that the U.S. knew the entire time.

One-by-one, the "Bojinka" bombings still happened. The first WTC bombing was on the list; TWA-800 and the Oklahoma City bombing had undeniable connections to "Project Bojinka."

Warnings aside, the continuous history of the bombings were living proof; yet the American Public was methodically lied to. No warnings were given, even to the flight crews.

That's factual history; not opinion!

Had the Kamikaze threat been known, the attacks would have been bloody, but thwarted. I can promise you that the pilots would have made radically different decisions.

Worse, the sky-rage issue has been plenty deadly in U.S. history, but neither the FAA nor the airlines would legitimately address the passenger monitoring-intervention issue. Sky-rage training has been mandated for a long time, but the FAA was essentially bought & paid for.

Remember that PSA had a suicide passenger case that took out an entire full plane about 1986/87.

Instead, the FAA methodically ignored the issue. Neither Congress - who knew the threat - nor the FBI - who was intimately aware of the Boston-Logan problem - would change a damn thing. Yet, they swore they had no warning. RUBBISH!

Guess what???? We got 9-11!

Any doubts; see -

Airline Safety ‘Net

- look to the TWA-800” and “Attack on America” links.

What isn't told on that site is that the captain of Continental Micronesia Flight 985 was a union safety team member. He'd protested the smuggler's paradise designed into the new Guam Airport terminal building - approved by Clinton. That same drug smuggling mechanism allows terrorists free reign in the Pacific. He didn't know what hit him or why.

While Customs has nearly the power of God, they couldn't get that loop-hole plugged. The FAA, again, was silent.

See -

"Air Mike Flight 985"

"The Rest of the CS-985 Story"

Those on the U.S. West Coast are probably entitled to be nervous.

If you're feeling brave, read the rest of the accounts on that Web site - particularly the letter to the FAA Administrator, Jane Garvey. On her watch, the Crew Rest, Crew Resource Management, Aircraft Wiring and Airport Security issues were ignored to an extreme.

After a body count of approximately 7,000, she still has a job. Even after the 9-11 horror, her boss, U.S. Transportation Secretary, Norman Minetta, made a comment on TV about, "...Jane Garvey and her great team."

You take it from there; we still have a threat on the front porch.
16 posted on 09/30/2001 10:14:14 PM PDT by SKYDRIFTER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Layth
Tell us the truth oh wise Middle Easterner. How did you get to be so damned smart? I'd just as soon start another Crusade against Islam about right now...please tell me why we shouldn't eliminate the Islamic barbarians?
17 posted on 09/30/2001 10:14:58 PM PDT by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Cuban123
Welcome to FreeRepublic.
18 posted on 09/30/2001 10:16:36 PM PDT by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Layth
You people (Americans) have allowed yourselves to be given over to the media and believe every word from your government (one who has a track record of desception - Vietnam, WWI, WWII, Gulf-War, etc..).

We have a tremendous number of options when it comes to "the media" and none of it is controlled by the government; a government OF the People, FOR the People, and BY the people. There's no other place like it on earth.

19 posted on 09/30/2001 10:22:40 PM PDT by onehipdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Layth
First Question - Exactly what country do you live in?

Second Question - Did you dance a jig when Towers 1 and 2 went down?

20 posted on 09/30/2001 10:28:10 PM PDT by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson