Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LSJohn; aristeides
LSJohn wrote: The only rational (rational, but evil) reason I can come up with is that the decision maker[s] didn't want certain members of our own intelligence community to know who these people are/were because those certain members can't/couldn't be trusted to keep their mouths shut.

From the Article: They included photographs, and information on their families, backgrounds and contacts. Most were 'Afghan Arabs', Saudis, Yemenis and Egyptians who had fought with bin Laden against the Soviets in Afghanistan.

The rational reason for not wanting the Sudanese dossiers is that the CIA and MI6 already had the information.

43 posted on 09/30/2001 9:24:18 AM PDT by Lessismore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Lessismore
The rational reason for not wanting the Sudanese dossiers is that the CIA and MI6 already had the information.

That would be a rational reason for not investing great resources in trying to obtain it, but not for rejecting it when offered. You accept it, review it, see whether it adds to your knowledge/understanding (but I agree with you that they already knew most of it.)

Refusing to accept it is powerful evidence of evil intent on the part of the decision-makers, whoever they were, and I'm not willing to assume it was only Clinton

48 posted on 09/30/2001 10:42:52 AM PDT by LSJohn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson