Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GVgirl
"Well, we've got this no first strike thing…"

No we don't. That was a BIG issue during the cold war when the USSR had us outnumbered with tanks and artillery in Europe by about five to one. Meanwhile, the Soviets promoted their "no first strike" policy and lambasted us for not joining them. Despite pressure from "peace" groups, we stood our ground, kept the option and therefore minimized the USSR's ability to intimidate us into accepting agreements that were more to their favor. (That's something else that will not be taught in most universities.)

There was a report that immediately after the attack, the Bush administration was inquiring into the kiloton yield of an exploding fully fueled 757. Speculation was that they were preparing a case for the terrorist having used weapons of mass destruction first.

71 posted on 09/30/2001 4:21:43 AM PDT by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: elfman2
Thank you. The no first strike position is one I've seen repeated here on FR several times. Happily corrected.
72 posted on 09/30/2001 5:46:17 AM PDT by GVnana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson