I will say this for the third time so try to pay attention. I acknowledge the fact you do not accept any documentation that Catholics offer so I am through discussing this with you. In other words, I agree to disagree. If it makes you feel better you can attack me, my scholarship, my research, my references, or even imply I screwed up. I just doesn't matter. Anyone who has done serious research on this knows Peter was in Rome and was martyred and buried there.
So when your citations are found to be bunk, rather than address it and stay on topic, you resort to attacking Peter's second book - quickly retreating from I Peter 5 argument, to save face maybe? At any rate, another Change of Topic.
I will repeat this for the second time. I am not attacking 2 Peter. Read my post 25 again. I am asking you to back up your statement " And I can debunk them pretty quickly with modern parallels. And with parallels of the day. "
And just in case you missed it, I agree to disagree regarding the Peter in Rome issue. If you keep asking me to stay on Topic I will repeat this again.
You are wrong in your attacks. You're approach is wrong. And the diversions aren't working. I am not going to allow this to escalate beyond what it has. So if someone else wants to debate the issues, I'm game. But, I'll not subject myself or the rest of those present to more of this. I played along to give you every chance; but, evidently, you can't see the problem while everyone messaging me privately can. If no one else wants to pick it up, we can pick it back up when you are 'feeling better'. But, again, I'm not letting this escalate further.