Replies

"Clinton and his staff prefered to pretend how wonderfull everything was rather than face reality."

As Liberals, they did not concern themselves with the 'reality of threats'; anymore that these Liberals who are chanting; 'Peace not War'. . .not getting the message that it has already been declared on us. (What can it possibly take?)

Clinton was interested in his self-agrandizement and the power he could wield. . .and one more thing that would obliterate any consciousness of our Country that by oath, he swore to protect. . .his obsession with sex. . .and the women he loved to hate. . .

Algore was there through it all, and never interferred. . .but then he was dealing with his own identity crisis - the one he didn't have when he was thirteen - and of course, he was preoccupied following his OWN money trail.

Bill and Al were both cheap, inauthentic leaders; who could do nothing that did not offer them personal gain. . .it is clear our Country was never a consideration.

Once the Russians moved out of Afghanistan, a whole lot of weapons and a lot of men, from all over the Muslim world, along with considerable funds became surplus, and as such available to the Inter Services Intelligence Directorate, to be further diverted towards Kashmir. The tempo, as such, of the covert operations, increased. Simultaneously, Pakistan lost no chance, and made every effort to raise the Kashmir issue in every forum, be it the Organisation of Islamic Countries, or the Commonwealth or the Commonwealth Heads of the Government Meet. Her operations in Kargil were just one more and the latest such attempt. Pakistan eventually struck gold when Robin Raphael made her statement that United States of America considers Jammu and Kashmir a disputed territory.

Pakistan, of course immediately interpreted the statement as an endorsement of her claim that Kashmir is a disputed territory. And there are only two disputants---India and Pakistan. It is indeed strange as to how Pakistan is being recognised as a disputant. Does one legitimise aggression? If that was the case why did United States of America and her allies, albeitly at the behest of the United Nations' Organisation.

One really wonders whether Ms Raphel, or for that matter Madeline Albright, or the entire United States State Department, really mean to make Pakistan a legitimate party to the dispute and as such legitimise the aggression, let loose by Pakistan.

I'm really not following you around today....it just seems that way. #92 is like reading my own mind! Were we separated at birth or something?

As Liberals, they did not concern themselves with the 'reality of threats'; anymore that these Liberals who are chanting; 'Peace not War'. . .not getting the message that it has already been declared on us. (What can it possibly take?)

San Francisco gets hit by a suitcase nuke, or anthrax? Then maybe they'll get what an 'act of war' means?

I can't get over the gall of these people, but then, it's prophesied in the Bible, "...and through peace He shall deceive many."