Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TonyInOhio
Which part of what he wrote is wrong???
6 posted on 09/28/2001 1:48:40 PM PDT by Ferris (whenwillwewakeup.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Ferris
None of it is wrong. It is all true and that is why no one will here will adress these issues on this thread, they may trash you, invite you to move off their God fearing soil, or ask you if you have ever served in their military, but they won't actually address the issues.
18 posted on 09/28/2001 2:24:48 PM PDT by Pakrman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Ferris
...more
if Al Gore had been elected President, and imposed these measures, these folks would be howling like madg dogs over it, however since President Bush is instituting these measures, then it must be ok.
same destination
just slightly different roads, that is all
19 posted on 09/28/2001 2:27:04 PM PDT by Pakrman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Ferris
Which part of what he wrote is wrong??? -ferris

Okay, you asked:

"WAR IS PEACE. A reckless war…"

There's no evidence that it's reckless.

"… will likely bring about a deadly cycle of retaliation"

Unproven speculation.

"…is being sold to us as the means to guarantee our safety…"

I'm not aware of anyone mentioning "guarantees"

" Meanwhile, we've been instructed to accept the permanent war as a fact of daily life."

I'm not aware of anyone on office claiming it will be "permanent"

"As the inevitable slaughter of innocents unfolds overseas."

We have a history of killing less "innocents" than any other nation in retaliation for aggression. I have not doubt that will continue as a goal.

" FREEDOM IS SLAVERY. "Freedom itself is under attack," Bush said, and he's right. Americans are about to lose many of their most cherished liberties in a frenzy of paranoid legislation."

A certain amout of civil discipline must absolutely be practiced by a nation in pursuit of military objectives.

"The government proposes to tap our phones, read our email and seize our credit card records without court order. It seeks authority to detain and deport immigrants without cause or trial. It proposes to use foreign agents to spy on American citizens. To save freedom, the warmongers intend to destroy it. "

Exaggerated and one sided. "The government" has yet to decide on their extent or duration.

"IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH. America's "new war" against terrorism will be fought with unprecedented secrecy, including heavy press restrictions not seen for years, the Pentagon has advised. "

Of course, there hasn't been a war "for years".

" Meanwhile, the sorry history of American imperialism -- collaboration with terrorists, bloody proxy wars against civilians, forcible replacement of democratic governments with corrupt dictatorships -- is strictly off-limits to mainstream media. "

I have know idea what the author's referring to. He can write about any of that as much as he wishes.

" Lest it weaken our resolve, we are not to be allowed to understand the reasons underlying the horrifying crimes of September 11.

Perhaps he's just upset that no one wants to read or publish his misunderstanding of the reasons.

The author writes like a college freshmen. He's a pushover to defeat, and I can't believe that anyone earns a living composing crap like that.

31 posted on 09/28/2001 4:12:56 PM PDT by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson